Pathfinder swing TS
Forums › ProRealTime English forum › ProOrder support › Pathfinder swing TS
- This topic has 2,004 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks ago by
Gianluca.
-
-
Mark, great job with Cooper. I made some small changes and reduced the position size from 3 to 2. I also checked Jan1 and Feb2 but your setup is the best. What a profitable setup butof course not riskless. Welcome in the hall of fame.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Reiner,
I noticed that there were no one taking care of Cocoa / CC. So I made some backtests and found a promising setup for F1.
Positionsize 1: 82% profitable trades with 8.5% drawdown. Gain: 17,9%
Positionsize 5: 90% profitable trades with 21.6% drawdown. Gain: 101.5%I also checked J2, but there was no profitable setup to be found and you showed this in the roadmap also.
I would be happy to support you in the future as well. Maybe there are more interesting instruments to check…/ Hakan
Hi Kasper, Barge, OMX Jan has only a few trades and I agree it’s statistical not significant for an algo. You both did the right things. I have made a test from Jan to May and to be honest it’s not my favourite and nothing for the hall of fame.
NExt test for dax (Mar2-apr2). it has 4 zero bar trades, but I verified with v.10.3 and it showed the same result.
Thank you for the hint Alco, this time I tested with 5 point spread.
So to get an overview of JAN2 trades will you present the hall of fame in the nearest future:-)?
On page one the first post you can find the hall of fame.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I have added the best robots that I have reviewed so far to the first post of this topic (hall of fame)
At the moment I plan to attach robots for the current (e.g J1) and the next period (e.g J2). It’s an agile project and I’m open how we proceed.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
AuthorPosts
Find exclusive trading pro-tools on