The screener does not take the growing MACD into account

Forums › ProRealTime English forum › ProScreener support › The screener does not take the growing MACD into account

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • 03/21/2018 at 1:04 PM #65983
    Meta Signals Pro

    Hi there,

    I am trying to have a very simple screener identifying stocks with this configuration:

    • oversold Weekly/Daily Stoch (the K% line)
    • growing Weekly/Daily MACD (not the Signal line)

    But for some reason, it does not take the parameter of the MACD into account ;

    Does anybody see why?

    Thanks !!

    Chris
    <pre class=”lang:probuilder decode:true “>REM Condition 1: Stoch en survente et en croissance + MACD weekly < 0 et croissant
    TIMEFRAME(WEEKLY)
    KW=STOCHASTIC[14,3]
    StochWeek = KW<25
    CroissStochWeek = KW>(KW)[1]
    MW=MACD[12,26,9]
    CroissMACDWeek = MW>(MW)[1]
    MiniVolume = volume>10000

    REM Condition 2: Stochastic daily < 25
    TIMEFRAME(DAILY)
    KD=STOCHASTIC[14,3]
    StochDay = KD<25
    CroissMACDDay = MACD>(MACD)[1]
    CroissStochDay = KD>(KD)[1]

    SCREENER[StochWeek and CroissStochWeek and CroissMACDWeek and MiniVolume and StochDay AND CroissMACDDay and CroissStochDay]

     

    03/21/2018 at 1:34 PM #65988
    robertogozzi

    The line

    is incomplete since it lacks due parameters embedded within brackets, didn’t ProScreener warn you?

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar Meta Signals Pro
    03/21/2018 at 5:36 PM #66006
    Meta Signals Pro

    Hi Robert,

    Thanks for your reply; no warning popped up.

    I don’t get what is improper to be honnest (keep learning the code);

    Is this a more correct coding? Thanks

     

    03/21/2018 at 5:41 PM #66007
    robertogozzi

    I don’t know what you ask about Macd, the second code is different from the first one!

    The first one had an incorrect line, how could you run it?

    03/21/2018 at 6:00 PM #66008
    Meta Signals Pro

    To me the second version expressed the same idea of a MACD line (not the signal) being growing as a condition; I assure you there was no error mentioned in the first code;

    Can you precise what exactly was wrong for my knowledge? Thanks

    03/21/2018 at 6:45 PM #66010
    robertogozzi

    Macd cannot be written MACD, it’s an error. It should be written

    as you did on the Weekly TF, that’s why I can’t figure out how it could run. I copied it to my ProScreener and I was warned about the error!

    In your second version, there is no reference to the MACD being < 0, perhaps you should add, on the Weekly/Daily (where you want to check it) chart

    As it is now, applied to ALL instruments, on a 1-minute TF, it does not return any occurrency.

     

     

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar Meta Signals Pro
    03/22/2018 at 12:10 AM #66032
    Meta Signals Pro

    Here is the code working now !

    thanks for your help Robert !

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar robertogozzi
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

Find exclusive trading pro-tools on ProRealCode Marketplace

Similar topics:
mlutiple ut – does not take the large one
the screener does not show the same values that the indicator
“multi time frame macd divergences” screener
backtesting does not work which a great amount of time units
can not log into prorealtime
change the macd indicator to zero lag macd
ema for heng seng index in demo does not work
is it possible to convert this strategy into a screener?
position does not exist
prt personal account vs prt ig account

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login