RIsk Ranges

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 112 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #132301 quote
    KillJoy
    Participant
    New

    @derricksikes
    The short, one word, reason for the wider spread is VOLUME – yesterday’s!

    The angle, of course, is in the details!!

    derricksikes thanked this post
    #132312 quote
    derricksikes
    Participant
    New

    For those of you digging in on Mandelbrot’s work, this site has links to what Yale considers his 14 most influential papers.  It includes the paper written with Van Ness mentioned during the Hurst discussion in Chapter 9 of The (Mis)Behavior of Markets.

    https://users.math.yale.edu/mandelbrot/webbooks/wb_top.html

    JohnLawsCarriage thanked this post
    #132558 quote
    snucke
    Participant
    Veteran

    how useful are the riskranges they provide? would you guys recomend subsribing to it?

    #132571 quote
    KillJoy
    Participant
    New

    @snucke

    Keith McCullough is very good at what he does. But only you can decide if Risk Ranges are right for you.  Risk Ranges are intermediate term support and resistance levels — PIVOTS, if you like. If that kind of trading appeals to you, do explore them.

    By the way, Risk Ranges will not make you money; The Process will!

    Best.

    #134081 quote
    JL
    Participant
    New

    Does anyone have the SPX risk ranges for May 19, 20, 22, 27 & 28?  I’m missing those data points.

    If someone could post those ranges I would be grateful.

    And I only began collecting the SPX risk ranges on April 24.  If anyone has data prior to that that would be helpful also.

    Thanks.

    #134131 quote
    Macro_trader
    Participant
    New

    Hi PJ –

    I’ve been trying to replicate Buddy’s expected range calc from some charts he’s posted on Twitter but I’m clearly doing something wrong. Are you able to post an Excel file with the actual calc or post an example of how you calculate it (I see the formula Buddy uses but I must be doing something wrong because my calculated range is different than his)? Similar to you, my guess is Keith’s range uses some version of this expected range with adjustments to the top and bottom of the range.

    I attached a table with Buddy’s expected range in case it’s useful to anyone.

    thanks

    Carlos Ribeiro thanked this post
    C96114B1-0751-4422-9F81-73E9646B8305.jpeg C96114B1-0751-4422-9F81-73E9646B8305.jpeg
    #134136 quote
    JohnLawsCarriage
    Participant
    Junior

    @JL
    Here you are. I built a program that grabs the risk ranges very easily. I don’t want to give out Keith’s sauce to the world though, I’m not sure if it’s the right thing to do. So I have it password protected. It will prompt you to enter two passwords, just use the same password twice. The password is the sell trade, the high end of the risk range, for the NIKKEI 225 INDEX in today’s (June 1st) risk range sheet. I have data going back to late January.

    Hope this helps.

    JL and Charlie92 thanked this post
    riskrangesjan-june.xlsx
    #134161 quote
    b_andries
    Participant
    New

    With your formula, can you also calculate a risk range for example of MDLA? Is the HURST coefficient import in the equation?

    Thank you!

    #134211 quote
    Charlie92
    Participant
    New

    @JohnLawsCarriage

    Thank you for the RR’s, but I don’t see any calculations – simply the daily rr’s typed into spreadsheet.  Are you actually calculating the ranges or is your program grabbing the numbers from theie website/product sheets?

    #134436 quote
    KillJoy
    Participant
    New

    @b_andries

    1. The GOLDEN RULE of trading is CUT your losses and let your profits RUN.
    2. Risk Ranges are NOT a Holy Grail by any stretch of imagination.
    3. Anyone can, and will, be wrong at times – some less than others.
    4. Because of 1 and 2 and 3 above, ALWAYS use STOPS no more than 10% for equities — no matter WHO SAYS WHAT – > 20% is sacrilege.
    5. Because of 1 and 2 and 3 above, NEVER risk more than 2% of your account on any one trade — no matter WHO SAYS WHAT.
    6. On 5 May 2020, MDLA was a clear BUY!
    7. The first SELL SHORT since then was yesterday, 2 June 2020.
    8. There is 80% probability MDLA going to 25.45; 50% going to 24.04; at this point in time not sure about 22.35.

    Stay SAFE.

    b_andries, derricksikes and Eastwood Smith_3 thanked this post
    MDLA.png MDLA.png
    #134480 quote
    Macro_trader
    Participant
    New

    @KillJoy

    Thanks for this. Are you able to provide some more detail about how you are calculating the MDLA ranges in the chart and the probability estimates? Also, what leads to say MDLA was clear buy on May 5…Just trying to learn. Thanks again!

    #134483 quote
    Carlos Ribeiro
    Participant
    Junior

    @Macro_trader

    What formula are you using to calculate those ranges?

    Thanks!

    #134489 quote
    KillJoy
    Participant
    New

    @Macro_trader


    @Carlos
    Ribeiro

    You will have to excuse me for not responding as asked today, or the next few says. It is 2:20 am past midnight here and I have no strength left. Nevertheless, I will hasten to add the lines on the chart are end of day prices volatility-based support and resistance; they are NOT ranges, or predictive turning points levels of any kind!

    Thursday and Friday I have prior commitments, but I shall write full disclosure in detail Saturday and Sunday.

    Please bear with me.

    Thank you.

    #134740 quote
    KillJoy
    Participant
    New

    MDLA SellShort is in fun territory now; if one can manage risk in the expanded volatility environment.

    MDLA_5June.png MDLA_5June.png
    #135446 quote
    grimweasel47
    Participant
    Senior

    Hi Guys

    I found the below in another forum that could be of interest?

     

    First of all let’s describe the strategy I used, the strategy would consist in two filter crosses with :

    A main filter who aimed to provide optimal noise removal while keeping high reactivity and a signal filter who aimed to provide optimal crosses with the main filter.

    Those filters where based on two groups of filters, the main filter F was using :

    An exponential moving average , a fractal adaptive moving average , a least squares moving average and a recursive filter S described as follows :

    S = (p*price+(1-p)*S) + k*(F – F’)

    Where p = running hurst exponent estimated via the rescaled range method and k = square root of p

    The signal filter F’ was using :

    least squares moving average , a simple volatility stop and a filter S’ described as follows :

    S’ = (p*price+(1-p)*S’) + k*(F – F’)

    Each filter F and F’ is calculated from a weighted sum that maximized the equity function of the strategy. Because I wasn’t patient I tossed aside the optimization of the filters settings and used a period of 50 for every filters in the main group and a period of 200 for every filters in the signal group.

    The optimization of the weights was done using gradient descent, because I was in a hurry I just used the weights found after a low number of epochs. Everything was done wrong, from picking the filters in the groups to training and testing the model.

    Charlie92 and derricksikes thanked this post
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 112 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

RIsk Ranges


ProBuilder: Indicators & Custom Tools

New Reply
Author
Summary

This topic contains 111 replies,
has 20 voices, and was last updated by jonpt88
3 years, 10 months ago.

Topic Details
Forum: ProBuilder: Indicators & Custom Tools
Language: English
Started: 09/19/2019
Status: Active
Attachments: 27 files
Logo Logo
Loading...