Machine Learning in ProOrder ProRealTime

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Machine Learning in ProOrder ProRealTime

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 455 total)
  • #121321

    @Paul … comment out Line 144. Also then … 1 less endif should be needed?

    My ‘sweating over it’ time may be a benefit to others as I tried just about every conceivable thing possible to get mine to work. Then – when I got it working – I went back over some things I tried to see what difference they should have made! 🙂

    Let us know if it works?

     

    #121324

    Also you need the initialisation below to be inserted in your code at Line 10  …

     

    #121329

    @Paul I got your code to run after making the changes above, but Valuex and ValueY are not changing.

    More sweating now! 🙂

    #121331

    Success … see attached!

    I looked at my working System and the only way I got mine to fully spark into life (with ValueX and ValueY changing) …  was to NOT include the code below … so there must be something wrong with below or the concept of below does not work??

    I guess JuanJ will have to help us with below?

     

     

    #121333

    Aha … I just  looked at my other fully working working System including the above code … but we do NOT need either lines of code below …

    So that’s saved JuanJ a bit more time! 🙂

    EDIT / PS

    Comparing results of both my 2 fully functional Systems and Paul’s System with and without the HeuristicsCycle Code above  … the results are the same both with and without!

    Maybe there could be instances where the HeuristicsCycle Code makes a difference?

    Thoughts:
    JuanJ noted cross-errors when he tried 2 x Algos together (some time ago) so he kindly provided the HeuristicsCycle Code as a solution.

    These cross-errors may have been  due to the cross-use (between the 2 x Algos) of certain settings due to the missing ‘2’ from certain settings (of Algo2) which I highlighted and corrected in an earlier post.

     

     

    #121334

    Hi Paul
    add to line 61

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #121350

    we do NOT need either lines of code below …

    Away from the screen my brain cleared! 🙂

    Without the lines of code below, we have nothing that is controlling / defining Algo1 and Algo2 and so the HeuristicsCycle code is not doing anything?  (This is why both sets of results are the same!).

    So I am now back to my earlier assertion that HeuristicsCycle code is not working for some reason?

     

    #121356

    Francesco did it before ….. he had two different results, but without code we don’t know how he did it.

    #121363

    he had two different results, but without code we don’t know how he did it.

    Francesco  results were before (without JuanJ code) and after (with JunanJ code).

    I have my Systems (and Paul’s) working – with the JuanJ Algo1 and Algo2 – but seemingly not using the code below.

     

    #121364

    If you remove this part of code, I seem to have understood that the results will not change you …. so there is something else different ….

    #121367

    Either …

    1.    The Cycle code above is not working and therefore achieving no change in the results?

    This scenario means that Algo1 and Algo2 are both working at the same time (on the same bar).

    OR

    2.   The Cycle code above is working as designed to do, but the results are the same as without the Cycle code above.

    This scenario means that Algo1 and Algo2 are working separately every 2 Cycles (on different bars).

    Item 2. is why I think that the Cycle code is not working as the results would not be identical??

     

    #121369

    Item 2. is why I think that the Cycle code is not working as the results would not be identical as without the Cycle code.

     

    #121393

    A lot of idea’s but i’am stuck at the moment.

    @GraHal, I tried many combinations, but to result. Also tried fifi’s idea.

    If someone got it to a working version, then please post the whole code.

    #121406

    If someone got it to a working version, then please post the whole code.

    Below is your code working and the results attached … you can see Valuex and ValueY as variables changing … under the equity curve.

     

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #121408

    And here is Paul’s code with the HeuristicsCycle all Rem’d out  … results on the top equity curve.

    Notice the top equity curve (rem’d out HeuristicsCycle  code) results are the same bottom equity curve (included HeuristicsCycle code ). Note: included = opposite of rem’d out.

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 455 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login