I coded a simple strategy on the daily chart that buys or sells and then closes the position at the next open. All was looking good so I thought that I would just try a simple bit of position sizing adjustment to see how it effected performance. Quite simply if the day is a winning day then position size is the maximum allowed but if it is a losing day then position size is reduced by 1 down to a minimum of 1.
All very simple but when I tested it suddenly I get a totally different number of trades and win rate depending on what the maximum allowed position size is. The trade count and win rate should not change as nothing but position size is different in the strategy! The first image is the results with a max starting position size from 1 to 14.
So then I thought I’d throw in a DEFPARAM CUMULATEORDERS = FALSE and this fixed the problem but created another which has been highlighted before as it only allows trades in the same direction on every other day. Second image is the results table for that.
So I went back to the first results and started looking at the charts and found that on anything above a maximum position size of 2 the equity curve was showing the strategy as having run out of money. How can it have run out of money having won so much and starting with a capital of 100k and having a maximum position size of only 3 at any time? It would seem to me that the back test is thinking that it has more positions open than it actually does. See third image.
Or am I missing something?
Here is the code but I have removed my ‘secret indicator’ – just replace it in line 24 with one of your choice. It simply has to be something that is rising or falling!
If I increase my starting capital to 1000000 then I can get all optimisation tests to run through with out running out of money. It seems like the back test thinks it has positions on the market that it doesn’t when it comes to calculating available equity. A possible bug?
I still don’t understand the trade count and win rate difference.
How to make a million by trading – get paid a dollar for every bug you find!
Jokes aside I think the reason for the different number of trades is that the back tests counts a change of position as a trade so if I place a 14 point bet and then conditions are still true but I am down then the strategy says sell 14 and buy 13 but in reality it sells 1 and calls it a trade. If however that happens thirteen times in a row then it says sell 1 and buy 1 but in reality does nothing and so that is not a trade. If you start with a max position of 2 then you get a lot more 1 to 1 non trades and a lot less 3 to 2 and 2 to 1 actual trades.
I think that somewhere some of the trades are not getting closed out in the ‘you’ve gone bust’ calculation.
.
