PRO GO WILLIAMS

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 17 total)

1 2 →

Author

Posts
07/16/2017 at 8:25 PM #40820 quote

maximus78
Participant

Senior

Ciao ragazzi, ho cercato di programmare l’indicatore Pro go di Williams secondo le sue istruzioni, ma qualcosa non mi torna (linea professional verde) guardando l’esempio di Williams allegato,

secondo voi è corretto e se non lo è mi sapete dare le giuste istruzioni?

Grazie mille in anticipo!

Massimo

Many, many years ago I wrote about how to separate public buying from professional buying. The essence of the technique was to create an A/D line for the public that shows
the change from yesterday’s close to today’s open (i.e. ProGo Public). The professional A/D line is then constructed by using the change from today’s open to today’s close (i.e.
ProGo Professional). Those two lines clearly “tip” us as to what is really going on.
We can take this one step farther by simply constructing an index of the previous close to open +/- values and then taking a 14 day average which is plotted against a 14 day
average of the +/- values of the open to close.
I can see at least two ways to use this data, and there may be more. The first is to simply look for divergences between price and the Professional (Pro) index. Price lows not
matched by the Pro index are bullish. New highs not matched by this index tend to be bearish.
Additionally, crossings of these two indicators have given some excellent intermediate term buy and sell signal as the charts below depict. This can be used as an entry or timing
technique with the rules as provided at the seminar.
Even in today’s electronic markets, ProGo still holds true.

Seguendo quello che scrive, il codice dovrebbe essere questo:

public=close[0]-open[1]
professional=open[0]-close[0]
progopublic=average[14](public)
progoprofessional=average[14](professional)
return progopublic as “public”, progoprofessional as “professional”

GraHal thanked this post

progo2.jpg

07/16/2017 at 11:21 PM #40835 quote

AVT
Participant

Senior

Sorry, I don’t speak enough italian to write the answer in your language. Just an idea:

open[0] <– known when day starts

close[0] <– NOT known until end of day

Put the whole data one day further back, for those days we have everything.

Hope that helps.

denmar thanked this post

07/17/2017 at 12:55 PM #40861 quote
AVT
Participant

Senior
Code:
```
// --- extern to play with it
AvgPeriod=14                       // opens & closes 1 day back
pubs = ( Dclose(2) - Dopen(1) )    // yesterday close -> today open
profs = ( Dopen(1) - Dclose(1) )   // today open -> today close
pubsAvg = average[AvgPeriod](pubs)
profsAvg = average[AvgPeriod](profs)
return pubsAvg as "public", profsAvg as "professionals", 0 as "zero line"
```
Test DAX daily: green=profs, red=pubs

uuuppsss.

ProGoWilliams-1.png
07/17/2017 at 7:09 PM #40892 quote
gabri
Participant

Master
Maximus,

the one you wrote works too. I just got rid of the [0]:
```
public=close-open[1]
professional=open-close
progopublic=average[14](public)
progoprofessional=average[14](professional)
return progopublic as "public", progoprofessional as "professional"
```
07/17/2017 at 7:44 PM #40898 quote

maximus78
Participant

Senior

Thank you guys,

so my code is right, except erasing the [0] and also using the dclose and dopen of the previous days,

Gabri, “public” should be close[1]-open, you wrote close-open[1] or am i wrong?

thanks a lot,

Max

07/17/2017 at 8:24 PM #40903 quote

GraHal
Participant

Master

Yep I concur … both give same results!

Thanks guys, this was a new one on me, but it appears to have a lot of merit!?

I’m going to incorporate it in some of my Strats and I’ll report back.

Cheers
GraHal

PS For clarification, I hadn’t seen Post #40898 when I posted above. So I was referring to the code at #40861 and #40892,

07/17/2017 at 9:06 PM #40910 quote

gabri
Participant

Master

Maximus, I copied yours and canceled the zeroes. I think you are right.

07/17/2017 at 9:48 PM #40913 quote

maximus78
Participant

Senior

Yes Grabri and GraHal,

I have mistaken too in my first post, it’s public=close[1]-open and i wrote close[0]-open[1]!

07/17/2017 at 10:05 PM #40914 quote

GraHal
Participant

Master

They’re not the same if you make the change to close[1]-open.

See attached

PS I need to get my posts out quicker and stop watching tv while I write them! Gotcha now … I had two the same, but they were BOTH wrong!!! HAHAHHA

ProGo-Same.jpg No-Same.jpg

07/17/2017 at 10:23 PM #40917 quote

GraHal
Participant

Master

I’ll have to read up on this again now … both same again, but it doesn’t look right somehow? See attached.

It’s probably cos I convinced myself of ‘incorrect logic’ using the wrong ones!? 🙂

ProGo.jpg

07/18/2017 at 9:07 AM #40927 quote
gabri
Participant

Master
Maybe this will fix the problem?
```
public=open-close[1]
professional=close-open
progopublic=average[14](public)
progoprofessional=average[14](professional)
return progopublic as "public", progoprofessional as "professional"
```
GraHal and Bard thanked this post
07/18/2017 at 10:46 AM #40942 quote

GraHal
Participant

Master

The ProGo is for use on Daily TF as close[1]-open takes account of the daily opening gap.

I am using it on 1M and 5M TF so I guess I’m using the Professional Line more as a Sentiment Index?

I’ve reversed the Pro Line (see attached) cos when I was writing conditions into a Strat code I found myself having to look back at the Chart. I find attached more intuitive as we all know that a steep rise is often quickly followed by a correction! (sorry Larry! 🙂 ).

GraHal

ProGo-Reversed.jpg

10/19/2021 at 8:04 AM #179906 quote

Suzu Yuk
Participant

Average

public=open-close[1] , professional=close-open

Qualcuno ha un’idea del perché abbiano senso distinguere pubblico e professionista dal primo posto? Perché questi possono separare l’acquisto pubblico dall’acquisto professionale?

~~Does anyone have an idea why these make sense to distinguish public and professional from first place? Why these can separate public buying from professional buying?~~

10/19/2021 at 8:15 AM #179913 quote

Suzu Yuk
Participant

Average

Riferimenti:

~~References:~~

https://www.prorealcode.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Larry-Williams-Accumulation-Distribution.pdf

https://www.scribd.com/document/525718849/XX-Williams-Larry-R-Inner-Circle-Workshop-Seminar-Manual

10/19/2021 at 8:17 AM #179914 quote

robertogozzi
Moderator

Master

@Suzu Yuk

Pubblica solo nella lingua del forum in cui stai postando. Ad esempio solo l’inglese nei forum di lingua inglese e il francese solo nei forum di lingua francese.

Grazie 🙂
Author

Posts