Navigator Trading System

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 152 total)

← 1 2 3 … 6 7 8 9 10 11 →

Author

Posts
03/31/2017 at 9:45 PM #30573 quote

GraHal
Participant

Master

Ha sorted!

@kg6450 It’s to do with times they need to be …

Line 14 ONCE timeSell = 080000
Line 15 ONCE timeBuy = 160000

Line 62 IF Time = 80000 THEN

GraHal

PS Sorry Mods Insert PRT Button not visible

03/31/2017 at 9:53 PM #30575 quote

GraHal
Participant

Master

@kg6450 I then get the curve attached

V1.jpg

04/01/2017 at 11:40 AM #30597 quote

GraHal
Participant

Master

Just checked the Navigator System on Walk Forward … one variable only, but fantastic results … see attached!

Early days yet as only got Walk Forward this morning! Check out the WF efficiency column … above 50% is good!

Surprising not seen loads of results on existing Systems and Walk Forward on the Site? They all need checking out now!

Love new tools, thank you PRT and Nicolas.

GraHal

Nav.jpg

04/01/2017 at 11:58 AM #30601 quote

CN
Participant

Senior

Is that v1 or v2 grahal?

04/01/2017 at 12:14 PM #30604 quote

GraHal
Participant

Master

V1 and its also on CFD contract … hence the big profit figures!

04/01/2017 at 12:15 PM #30605 quote

CN
Participant

Senior

Looks very promising.

04/01/2017 at 4:08 PM #30621 quote

actionjackson
Participant

Senior

last open position closed on Friday with a profit of 3.587 Euro!

04/01/2017 at 8:40 PM #30628 quote

winnie37
Participant

Veteran

Hi Grahal,

i don’t understand very welll how to proceed to do a walk forward… Could you give me the example with Navigator. I already run it in live…

Thanks a lot

04/02/2017 at 8:47 AM #30648 quote

zilliq
Participant

Master

Hi Grahal,

Thanks for your trial,

Try with more variables, may be 3-4, because I think that less variable you have less results are as a “normal” optimisation (to try)

Zilliq

04/02/2017 at 9:06 AM #30649 quote

zilliq
Participant

Master

Well, I did it for you 😉

WF from 5 december 2012 and with 3 variable

WFE+/-50 %

3/5 periods >50 %

As I thought less good, but good

To try with more variable but very very slow…

On graph at left a “normal” optimisation on right the WF results

Zilliq

2017-04-02_10h02_19.jpg

04/02/2017 at 9:09 AM #30655 quote

CN
Participant

Senior

Zilliq, mind doing WF with V1 aswell?

04/02/2017 at 9:24 AM #30656 quote

zilliq
Participant

Master

It was with the V2 why use V1 ?

04/02/2017 at 9:36 AM #30658 quote

CN
Participant

Senior

Better ratio and % win

04/02/2017 at 9:59 AM #30663 quote

zilliq
Participant

Master

5 variables and results are less less good 🙁

As I say, I think that more variable we have for WF more it is realistic

And less variables we have more it is as a “normal” optimisation

I don’t know why the system stop. Probablement it loss too much…

So be careful with systems and WF 😉

Zilliq

2017-04-02_10h56_22.jpg

04/02/2017 at 10:02 AM #30667 quote

Eric
Participant

Master

If anyone here has access to 15 years data on FDAX?

https://www.prorealtime.com/en/technology_premium

it would be interesting to see a out of sample test pre 2012 with the bear market 2008-2009 included
Author

Posts