Strategy DayOpen Straddle for DAX

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Strategy DayOpen Straddle for DAX

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 242 total)
  • #102291

    here’s compared only ts, only bb, both

    All a bit the same result, but as you see you surrendered potential profit last day, which wouldn’t happen if both were active.

     

    also both with safety active with 0.50; lower average loss, lower drawdown

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    #102557
    AE

    Thanks you Paul, I love this strategy since I saw your first version.

    You said this strategy doesn’t work really good in downtrend, but in TF 1 minuto works even downtrend?

     

    Thanks

    #102617

    Thanks for all, this strategy is awesome… Could anybody post the latest version of the code ?? Thanks you

    #102625

    Thanks Paul for this strategy! I’ve just spend 2 hours to read all the 11 pages of this topic and trying every version on every UT. Great job! Now I have to decide which UT I will choose to begin.

    #102627

    Hi again guys,

    what about overnight? I tried to add this king of code and it doesn’t seem to be more profitable, but maybe safer with some gap.

    What do you think about it?

    Gregg

    #102665

    @AE as it is right know, long could get triggered fast in a downtrend.

    @Pablo Jimenez latest version is already posted

    @Gregg the strategy doesn’t hold a position in the weekend, which is preferable I think. It only holds overnight during the week.

    Adding that code during the week, it closes a long position at 21h and takes a short one.

    Safest is change 240000 to something lower so it closes each day all positions. Perhaps turn of trendsafetyexit.

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #102880

    I’m running live Dayopen straddle v4.2 with this settings// Money Management// Money Management

    A curious almost flat evolution since march 2019. And no trades for 3 days now….Paul, you can confirm?

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #103000

    Yeah the strategy didn’t produce any trades and that is good because otherwise you would’ve lost.

    The reason is the main criteria which uses the Mid-Level Day indicator.

    To avoid certain markets, lines have to be different from each-other and now they are not so that’s the reason no trades are produced.

    I included the indicator below. If  that is put on a price-chart and you see the same values for green and blue or blue and red it means no trades that day.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #103041
    dar

    Hi All, Is there a new version of this code available? Im running my Test on version 3.

    #103060

    Yes there’s a new version, still working on a few question marks though.

    i.e. mid level day indicator is based on 5 previous days. To make sure that there are no trades in the first 5 days of a backtest, which works on every timeframe and doesn’t influence live trading.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    #103074

    Looks really good Paul.

    I like the low DD, only 240€.

    During which time is it optimized?

    #103077
    AE

    Hi Paul,

    When did you estimate could you please send us this new version? It looks really good!

    Thanks

    #103092
    dar

    Thanks Paul for the reply. Thats looks really good. Can’t wait to test it.

    #103097

    Hi @paul,

    I compare the strategy with this Mid Level Day indicator and you’re perfectly right, we understand well why there is no trades with these 3 lines! I’m testing some different values for this parameter but I’m impatient to see yours  🙂

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #103102

    some info folks.

    new version has slightly altered entry. Finally fixed the problem 100% although that doesn’t has great positive impact on results.

    Problem was condition for buy could be true and at the same time short could be true.

    It mattered if the code had the buy first, or the short first and that influenced results.

    The challenge was to make it independed if short or long was first and that the equity-curve was at-least equal or better.

     

    I’ve tested if every criteria is needed. So I compared the main criteria with the extra criteria (latest and first version) and check that with optimised nopl/nops.

    As I found out, you can remove the extra criteria completely or just disable it. Run with nopl2 and nops6. Also removed safetyexit, ordertype and lunch.

    Version will be published a bit later as I ran into a small issue live.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 242 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login