Breakout Strategy for the Dax and Dow Open – Trader Tom

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Breakout Strategy for the Dax and Dow Open – Trader Tom

Viewing 9 posts - 46 through 54 (of 54 total)
  • #181438
    smp

    Not left it. Just read all ur comments and im happy tho topic made an ipmpact on u 😊

    Just trying to help you out with your query fella! 😁

    #181439

    I suspect a “classic” open range breakout with SL in the middle of the channel or at the other end will give better results. Maybe a little more robust in the long term.

    #181440

    I once subscribed to a signal service for the Dax … it set a LimitOrder 30Pips in the M5 chart at 08:55 under the close of the candle with SL30 / TP40. This is then fished and triggered sometime after 09:00. The joke is, it’s still profitable today, years later. I have no idea what settings he is using today. In any case, I never understood back then how he filters the entry to get the trend direction out … That just as a side note, because it just occurred to me.
    All German time, by the way.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #181441

    Vincent’s 2min version starts to look credible (first pic).

    In the 2nd pic I tweaked the numbers, squeezed a bit more out of it. Trailing stop is def worth trying.

    The biggest problem with this kind of algo (as someone already mentioned) is the slippage. The backtest might say you’ve bought at the opening price, but in real life what you get is 6 or 8 points worse.

    @VinzentVega

    Note that I changed the MM from what you had (a code that I wrote). I’m no longer using that one, especially with the settings you have – that will blow up your account for sure 😎

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #181448

    another problem – there’s something not right with the embedded spread code. It seems to make sense but when I take that out and just tick the box for 1.2 as usual, the results are much worse.

    this would need lengthy testing in demo to get a clearer picture.

    #181449

    another problem – there’s something not right with the embedded spread code. It seems to make sense but when I take that out and just tick the box for 1.2 as usual, the results are much worse.

    Well, thats true. I don´t have any idea, where this diffrent came from.

    #181450

    I’m not following this Thread 100% and not read the code, but with spread = 1.2  embedded in the code …  is the code accounting for 0.6 spread when buy and then 0.6 when sell (vice versa with shorts).

    Above is how spread = 1.2 entered in the backtest engine works and in Real Live trades.

    #181451

    Hi.

    GraHal Just to be clear. What exactly do u mean with:

    “Above is how spread = 1.2 entered in the backtest engine works and in Real Live trades”

     

    With Spread in code like this:

     

    Or Check the box with spread and remove code about spred?

    #181453

    Yes, but there is more code related to usage of Spread than just Spread = 1.2 (as Spread = X in the code means nothing to PRT as Spread is not a ‘PRT Reserved Term’) /

    I’m sure there is more code than just Spread = 1.2 in the System Code … I’m just saying.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 9 posts - 46 through 54 (of 54 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login