robertogozzi wrote:

All’s well that ends well!

Maybe not … @maximus78 may have used Roberto code (thinking it was correct / what he needed) and has blown his account … never to be seen again!

Only teasing! 🙂

I know reviving old topics may be dangerous, but keeping an error running is more dangerous!

…and the final test. All three in one indicator and output compared. They all do the same thing.

//maximus
a=close>close[1] and  close>close[2] and close>close[3] and close>close[4] and close>close[5]

if a then
result=1
else
result=0
endif

//roberto
IF close > highest[5](close[1]) THEN
result2=1
else
result2=0
endif

//vonasi
x = 5
count = 0
for i = 1 to x
if close > close[i] then
count = count + 1
endif
next
 
result3 = 0
if count = x then
result3 = 1
endif

//final check
result4 = result + result2 + result3

flag = 0
if result4 <> 0 and result4 <> 3 then
flag = 1
endif

return flag

GraHal wrote:

more than one way to splice the mainbrace eh!

…or more than one way to skin a cat….. or more than one way to trip over it in Roberto’s case! 🙂

robertogozzi wrote:

but not my 4th one (summation).

Thank God one of us has finally confirmed that we were wrong – even if it was only 50% wrong! 🙂