wp01Participant
Master
Yes, i’m running your 1.1 version.
Sorry Patrick, since I’m not running that version live anymore I can’t help you.
I’m running this one since a month:
wp01Participant
Master
That’s ok. Thanks for your reply. This version looks a lot better…
Have you also updated other versions?
AERO, BUS (new), CHEMS, DRINKS
EE (new), ENGINE, FOOD, HEALTH
HOTELS, INSURANCE, INV (new), LC
wp01Participant
Master
You’ve been busy. Thanks.
MEDIA (new), OZCONSUM, SUPPORT, TK
I tried long and short on all instruments I could find, but these are the ones I found to be better than version 1 for one reason or another (lower risk, more trades, better profit)
wp01Participant
Master
Thanks David. You mentioned earlier that you were going to handle it differently after the huge drawdown.
I’m not sure how to tackle it when optimizing for the whole year. There is not such as a roadmap as we have for swing PF.
Or is it just trying?
I start with all periods activated and try to optimise as best as I can and then start to de-activate (or trying -1) one period after another to see if it affects the results positive in some way and then optimise all numbers again.
@Patrick (and others?)
I noticed today that not all instruments accept 0.5 as positionsize even though they say they do.
Instruments that does accept 0.5: TK and WATER
The others do not. The codes need to be changed to 1 positionsize and maxpositionsize altered to fit.
Hi David,
I am not a programmer but is not it the position that is too close to the price when an order is triggered?
@Matriciel,
No, that is another matter.
Here the system still works, but instead of buying 0.5 contract it buys 1. Since the maxposition in the system and the number of contracts you let the system run with, is higher than 0.5 it works. But the accumulation doesn’t work as intended instead. Also, the risk increases of course.
Best regards, David