“ProScreener” and “Probuilder” deliver different results with identical code
-
hello colleagues,
to show the facts, i add the last 200 close values in both the builder and the screener.
Unfortunately, I get different results and have no idea why.
I’d like to discuss this with you. Maybe some of you knows a work around.As in the attachments, the code for both surroundings just with // or without //:
//SreenerTest
//DefParam DRAWONLASTBARONLY=Truev1 = close
v2 = summation[200](v1)
v3 = round(v2)
//DRAWTEXT(” #v3#”, barindex, v1, Dialog, Bold, 16)//Return v1
SCREENER (v3 as “v3”)Thank you for your prompt reply. It looks like we are one step ahead, you are absolutely right that FX pairs match. But could you please also test “Italy 40 [Cobe]”, as almost none of my values currently match.Hi,
I tested your indicator/screener on the Italian stock market and there are no differences between the indicator and the screener (not even in demo) …
It may be that you are using a version (EOD version) that has less historical data than necessary… (try lowering 200 to, say, 100 or 50 and see if the same differences occur) …
Thank you for your test / suggestions and the hope that this should work for me too. I have tested your suggestions, but unfortunately without a solution to my problem. Regardless of how many historical data I use 50 or 200 the difference remains. However, if I only use 50, the difference is smaller, as expected. I ran the test both in paper mode and in real money mode, with the same difference.Wow, that’s the solution!!! I am very grateful for your support!JS thanked this post
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Author
Summary
This topic contains 7 replies,
has 3 voices, and was last updated by
1 year, 8 months ago.
Topic Details
| Forum: | ProScreener: Market Scanners & Detection |
| Language: | English |
| Started: | 06/21/2024 |
| Status: | Active |
| Attachments: | 8 files |
