In statistics, the Pearson correlation coefficient, also referred to as Pearson’s r, the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (PPMCC), is a measure of linearcorrelation between two sets of data. It is the covariance of two variables, divided by the product of their standard deviations; thus it is essentially a normalised measurement of the covariance, such that the result always has a value between −1 and 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearson_correlation_coefficient
There was a discussion on this topic started here , but the initiator seem to have found the solution, but didn’t post it…
So, I’ll try…
Pearson correlation coefficient
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
//ρ (rho) = cov(x, y) / (sd(x) * sd(y)), where cov is covariance, sd(x) is the standard deviation of x, etc.
// cov(x,y) = ((x - E(x) * (y - E(y) ), where E(x) is the Expected Value of x...
// E(x) = average(x), the expected value is the weighted sum of the xi values, with the probabilities pi as the weights. When values of x are equiprobable, then the weighted average turns into the simple average.
While this correlation coefficient R shows the correlation between two variables for the current candle, I wonder if it’s not more appropriate to measure correlation of X (say Close) of candle [P] with another variable, say RSI, of previous candle [P-1]. Meaning that one can nealry predict at least direction of X based on the result of previous candle of Y.
The most difficult now, is to find the most appropriate Y (RSI? Stoch? Volume? or combination of a few variables? calculated on same period than X or different period? )
Please share your thoughts or any improvment you may think of.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok