Fractal breakout intraday Strategy EUR/USD 1H –

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Fractal breakout intraday Strategy EUR/USD 1H –

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 360 total)
  • #49354

    Here,

    a 200000 backtest.

    it seem good, but the problem with this strategy are the slippage and spread during news or big event?

    what do you think about this?

    #49357

    @rejo007: Looks pretty nice. Only drawdown missing, probably because of that bug when testing…

    #49358

    yes, i have lot of time this problem of withdraw…

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #53893
    ALE

    NEW VERSION

    ATTENTION TO THE TRAILING STOP, NEEDS TO DIVIDE THE DECIMAL, AS SUITABLE ONES TO TRY USING THE FUNCTION GRAPH

    7 users thanked author for this post.
    #53903

    Hello ALE. It doesn’t seem to fair too well in 100K WF testing. Not many trades to base it on though. Do you get similar results?

    #53923

    HI Ale,  

    interest concept , did you test with 200k bar  also ? 

    Thansk 

    #53943
    ALE

    Hello,

    I’ve work since 2010 to test tick by tick, because we have had many different from real version and backtest, anyway I’ve attached my result with 1 pip spread :

    #53950

    Those are interesting results ALE. I guess you could call my 100k WF test an in sample test which although profitable the WF results would give reason for doubts about robustness. Then your 200k test provides an out of sample period where strategy performance is comparable. This gives some confidence that it may continue working. My only concern is the number of trades – 129 is not many. Glad to see that my Cumulative RSI idea has been kept in the strategy though!

    Definitely one to watch.

    #53952
    ALE

    On 1 hour time frame , It’s difficult to speake about  robustness, I suggest to look for high Gain/loss value. 

    #53958

    On 1 hour time frame , It’s difficult to speake about robustness, I suggest to look for high Gain/loss value.

    That is very interesting that you say that as I have been struggling to persuade myself that my shorter time frame strategies (1Hour or less)  are any good and finding that my longer (daily and 4Hr) are  proving  more robust after WF testing. Maybe you are right and WF testing is less relevant to shorter time frame strategies but I cannot think why that would be. Have you run a WF on your 200K period or back to 2010 period using a dummy value to see how it fairs?

    #53959

    Regarding WF on short time frame strategies – maybe we just need to be happy that it is profitable in every OS period tested rather than getting hung up on the actual number and looking for the perfect result?

    #53962

    Hello, 

    Could you post the files without variables, because I have problem to run it.

    Thanks a lot

    Usdjpy and gbpusd could be a good pair for this strategy

    #53963

    With the permission of ALE,

    Here is the file without the graphics and the variables, so you can run it in DEMO.

    btw, Very nice job of improvement of the original code.

    Saludos,

    Juan

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #53965
    ALE

    THANK YOU VERY MUCH JUAN!… 😉

    #53966
    ALE

    @Vonasi
    as we know the problem is the unpredictable movement of the market under daily time frame. The best and simple strategy that we can find are often on daily time frame. The WF work good, the problem it’s unpredictability and the and the ever-changing market movements on low time frames.

     

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 360 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login