Dax adaptable strategy Breackout/Mean reversion

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Dax adaptable strategy Breackout/Mean reversion

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 83 total)
  • #34479

    Hi, busy day today. Haven’t had a chance to take a look at 200k. Equity curve looks very similar to the original…

    Are any of your WF OOS variables hitting your optimisations min and max values?

    #34480

    Hi Cosmic, unfortunately I did not take note of the optimized variables of the wf test and it took few hours to run it. Im going to check again but Im travelling until tuesday. Maybe I could work on it tomorrow afternoon.

    Regards

    Francesco

    #34485

    No worries. You can drag those results to an excel spreadsheet. It does not drag the variables used though. You have to input those manually to Excel for each OOS sample. Just hover over the x with your mouse.

    Also best to take a screen shot of your optimise window so you know what you were optimising and the min and max variables you were using for them.

    I tend to run 1 pass at 70/30 to begin with especially for the bigger time frames / limited amount of trades.

    #34666

    Hi,

    very interesting strategy. Please can you indicate the latest version, with the indication of the best TF,  in order to try to develope it in other instruments ?

    Thanks

     

     

    #34695

    Hi Emanuele,

    thank you for your interests in the strategy.

    Sure, I attach the latest 2 version on the DAX. TIme frame 1hr and 30 mins.

    I have added stoplosses and profit taking, that are optimized on the basis of a multiplier to the ATR.

    Would be extremely good to know if the strategy could work on other instruments, I had a look to EUR/USD with nice results, FTSE100 and CAC40 too might be promising .

    Regards

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #34715

    Grazie Francesco,

    testero’ la strategia e provero’ su altri strumenti. Sono italiano rispondo solo questa volta in italiano e seguiranno commenti in inglese a supporto di tutti.

    Grazie

     

     

     

    #34720

    Grazie a te! Speriamo che esca fuori qualcosa di interessante!

    #34817

    hi,

    You also have a version without seasonality. I wanted to make tests with only one contract and then evaluate the introduction of seasonality or something else. If you do not have the season-free version I can change it. Thank you

    #34871

    There you go. I dont know if the optimizaiton works well also for the case with fixed sizes. Regards

     

    #35213

    This is such a great strategy, I have been running it for a while now and I really like the look of it.

    It is really interesting because it takes one direction in the morning, and when that is in profit it somehow reverses the position the otherway and takes profit in that direction too.

    Has anyone tried optimising it for other indices like FTSE or DOW? I am currently at work at the moment but when I get home I will see what results I can get on those.

    Once again great work @Francesco78 !!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #35220

    Thank you kg6450! 🙂

    Out of  curiosity, have you run any of the version in real account?

     

    Best

    Francesco

     

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #35358

    Thanks a lot Francesco for your work to improve this strategy. I’d like to help and might have a look at your code this week-end.

    #35359

    Thanks a lot Nicolas,that’s very kind of you.

    Regards

    Francesco

    #35412

    I made cleanup in the code for my understanding. Just launched a walk forward optimisation through 200k bars on the variables that should be adjusted overtime IMO. So your assumption about mean reverting, for a long order for instance, is : a low volatility (ATR) + no trend (with ADX criteria) and the actual candlestick is bearish?

    #35428

    Salut Nicolas, thanks a lot for your support.

    Yes that is correct . But to be precise, I have define two vols scenarios. In both case the strategy is  the same ( mean reverting or breakout depending on the adx) but in the 2 cases the condition to enter into a trade differs in the sense that the multiplier are differents. M and N in case of high vol and m1 and n1 in case of low vol.

    I hope I calrified.

    Regards

    Francesco

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 83 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login