Discussing the strategy VECTORIAL DAX (M5)

Viewing 15 posts - 751 through 765 (of 1,264 total)

← 1 2 3 … 50 51 52 … 83 84 85 →

Author

Posts
05/10/2020 at 4:12 PM #130956 quote

Paul
Participant

Master

Here is my modification of Balmora’s original. I went back to the beginning and made a few small changes with in mind it had to be a lite version.

Besides that, the trailing stop kicks in when atr distance is 8 and quickly moves to 4 when there are no new high/low made in an effort not to surrender too much gains.

With 2% stoploss and a trailingstop there are lot’s off signals which aren’t visible when in a position. So it’s important to be able to include those, especially in the optimisation!

Inserted reenter, so every true conditions to enter the market could be tested, even when current position was in loss, profit or both. (selectable) Then it’s closed and opened again in same direction.

It means more trades and smaller average losses/gains and still this strategy is maintaining a similar result despite more trades. a good indication for robustness!

Nacho, Francesco, nonetheless and 7 others thanked this post

Vectorial-DAX-5m-v121p.itf

05/10/2020 at 9:34 PM #131031 quote

Exalaxe
Participant

Senior

Little question which should be obvious for you:

How many occurencies should i choose in the Walk Forward?

05/10/2020 at 10:52 PM #131041 quote

swedshare
Participant

Senior

If it’s the 121-version you wish to backtest you can set it to 1 and then inactive.

05/11/2020 at 8:45 PM #131203 quote

Exalaxe
Participant

Senior

ok. Thank you.

05/12/2020 at 1:12 PM #131300 quote

deleted23092025
Participant

New

todays position wasnt good at all,,

.

05/13/2020 at 12:54 PM #131493 quote

Nacho
Participant

Senior

Good premiere on the first day it operates!

Screenshot_1.jpg

05/13/2020 at 5:44 PM #131535 quote

deleted23092025
Participant

New

Nacho you jinxed it

05/15/2020 at 2:26 PM #131778 quote

Paul
Participant

Master

one thing to point out.

running it for long only and short only, both performances with current settings are poor. Long & short work together with eachother and both have in part optimised settings. That is one major reliability issue regardless how the performance looks if both are active at the same time, is it not?

05/16/2020 at 7:24 PM #131885 quote

Paul
Participant

Master

on 121p, simply selecting long/short only resulted in (very) poor performance.

It uses the stoploss of 2% and a big trailingstop.

So new test, the focus is long/short only, it needed a smaller stoploss and changed it to 0.5%

Made the trailingstop faster (atr 6), optimised the settings (and went back to the original values) and optimised the angle. Without the trend detection.

nonetheless, swedshare, Sebastian Arsjo, Balmora74 and GraHal thanked this post

Screenshot-2020-05-16-at-20.15.44.jpg Screenshot-2020-05-16-at-20.16.51.jpg Screenshot-2020-05-16-at-20.21.17.jpg

05/17/2020 at 12:53 PM #131954 quote

Balmora74
Participant

Veteran

Hi Paul. What do you mean when you say : “without the trend detection” ? . It is the Average [20] and/ or Average[35] condition for CONDBUY and CONDSELL ?

05/17/2020 at 1:51 PM #131965 quote

Paul
Participant

Master

Hi, yeah that’s it.

here’s the latest, I don’t know how to improve with only few extra criteria significantly for only short & only long.

keewee, swedshare, GraHal and 4 others thanked this post

Vectorial-DAX-5m-v130p.itf

05/17/2020 at 10:41 PM #132037 quote

Balmora74
Participant

Veteran

Paul this is the last version of the code i’m running since one month and the results seems quite good. I added ATR + Daily / Weekly and Monthly Pivot for calculating the PositionSize and as a filter for entry point. Perhaps a idea to improve the your excellent v130p version of Vectorial Dax…

Paul, nonetheless, zilliq and 5 others thanked this post

Vectorial-DAX-M5-basic-v2.itf Capture-décran-2020-05-17-23.39.19.png Capture-décran-2020-05-17-23.39.36.png Capture-décran-2020-05-17-23.39.45.png

05/18/2020 at 1:22 AM #132050 quote

Paul
Participant

Master

Thanks a lot for releasing a new version Balmora74! Looks very interesting, first thing I think where v130 can be improved with is pivots. Got some work to do! 🙂

05/20/2020 at 11:47 PM #132490 quote

BobFlynn
Participant

Senior

Maybe it’s curve fitting guys, but I get best results when using 5 instead of 11 and 20 instead of 36 for the ATR position sizing. Tested the robustness and it looks quite alright, let me know what you think 🙂

@Balmora74, how did you found the ATR values ? I’m working on a more gradual sizing position on your “basic” version.

Anyhow, even older versions are working quite well despite the crash, I’m very surprised, i honestly thought there was some overfitting in the air, but apparently not so much ! Good job guys!

swedshare thanked this post

05/21/2020 at 10:55 AM #132557 quote

zilliq
Participant

Master

Paul wrote:

Hi, yeah that’s it.

here’s the latest, I don’t know how to improve with only few extra criteria significantly for only short & only long.

Hi @Paul
Why do you separate long/short robots ? Do you think it ameliorate something ?

Cheers
Author

Posts