ema-sma + Volume

v10.3
ema-sma + Volume

Oscillator from the difference between Ema and Sma around line 0, fairly reactive if you use the crossing of the 2 lines, more conservative if you expect the lines to cross the zero line. Histogram / column for the large change in volume with the cut so that it only shows a large divergence with the mean. colors show trends.

Share this

Risk disclosure:

No information on this site is investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Trading may expose you to risk of loss greater than your deposits and is only suitable for experienced investors who have sufficient financial means to bear such risk.

ProRealTime ITF files and other attachments : How to import ITF files into ProRealTime platform?

PRC is also on YouTube, subscribe to our channel for exclusive content and tutorials

  1. ChemaGeek • 06/28/2021 #

    Bonjour Nicolas, j’ai récemment découvert cet indicateur (Regularized Momentum 2017) et je le trouve très intéressant, mais je voulais vous demander, quelle ligne du code dois-je modifier pour que les résultats numériques des quatre lignes qui composent le graphique apparaissent avec plus de cinq décimales places, par exemple avec sept ( 0,00000012)
    Merci

  2. YvesRobert • 06/28/2021 #

    Bonjour, nouveau sur PRT (qq jours), j’essaie un peu de voir quel type d’indicateur me conviendrait et je vais voir si celui-ci peut m’aider. Merci pour votre aide et vos nombreux posts très utiles pour les amateurs comme moi. Bien cordialement

avatar
Register or

Likes

avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar

+5 more likes

Related users ' posts
Nicolas
10 years ago
Nicolas
10 years ago
Nicolas
10 years ago
Nicolas Just replace the last line with this : RETURN dm as "Volume Weighted MACD", masignal as "Si...
thomas2004ch I happen to read this article. I would say the formel 'd = maslow - mafast' could be inverse...
Nicolas You are right! but still the picture is looking good. The formula is inverted! dunno why :) ...

Top