After the WF runs, we get a detailed report. I have never paid much attention to this as I was primarily interested in the values that were used in each optimisation period.
Now I have a WF report that produces by far the best looking monthly histogram as well as other metrics, but no combination of variables can reproduce those results. So where does it come from?
I’d post something but there’s nothing to see; it’s just that I can’t reproduce the results that came up on the WF Detailed Report. I’ve tried all the possible combinations that would have been covered in the optimisation. Obviously some are close enough to work with, but now I’m curious to know what values it draws on to produce that report.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.