Volume on Proscreener

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 10/18/2023 at 4:39 PM #222623 quote
    davidator
    Participant
    Junior

    Hi,

    Can anyone tell me, please, what is wrong with this simple volume command?

    indicator6 = Volume
    indicator7 = Average[20](Volume)*1.5
    c4 = (indicator6[1] > indicator7[1])

    I just want to set the rule : “Volume is higher than the moving average”, but the screener always shows 0 results

    Thanks for help

    10/18/2023 at 6:01 PM #222632 quote
    robertogozzi
    Moderator
    Master

    The pic shows the results I get from the Italy list.

    In your code the last line is missing (the SCREENER line), is that the issue? In this it should have been reported as an error, though.

    davidator thanked this post
    x-5.jpg x-5.jpg
    10/18/2023 at 11:28 PM #222638 quote
    davidator
    Participant
    Junior

    Thanks Roberto.

    I have other lines with other rules and the screener works properly, as soon as I add the volume one I always get 0 as result, but not an error.

    Without the lines regards the volume it works.

    This is the full code, which now shows 0:

    indicator1, ignored = CALL “Engulfing Istogramma”
    c1 = (indicator1[1] > 0)

    indicator2 = ExponentialAverage[10](close)
    indicator3 = ExponentialAverage[20](close)
    c2 = (indicator2[1] > indicator3[1])

    indicator4 = ExponentialAverage[20](close)
    indicator5 = ExponentialAverage[50](close)
    c3 = (indicator4[1] > indicator5[1])

    indicator6 = AverageTrueRange[20](close)
    c4 = (indicator6[1] > indicator6[2])

    indicator7 = Volume
    indicator8 = Average[20](Volume)*1.5
    c5 = (indicator7[1] > indicator8[1])

    SCREENER[c1 AND c2 AND c3 AND c4 AND c5] (Variation AS “% Var barra prec”)

    10/22/2023 at 6:44 AM #222766 quote
    qigley
    Participant
    Junior

    Using filters C2 and C3 and C4 and C5 I get 22 results from the NYSE. So those conditions are fine.
    Obviously whatever C1 is filtering is conflicting with your volume filter C4. You need to work that out.

    10/22/2023 at 7:26 PM #222794 quote
    qigley
    Participant
    Junior
    qigley wrote:

    Using filters C2 and C3 and C4 and C5 I get 22 results from the NYSE. So those conditions are fine.

    Obviously whatever C1 is filtering is conflicting with your volume filter C4. You need to work that out.

    Correction: I meant “Obviously whatever C1 is filtering is conflicting with your volume filter C5. You need to work that out.”

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Volume on Proscreener


ProScreener: Market Scanners & Detection

New Reply
Author
author-avatar
davidator @davidator Participant
Summary

This topic contains 4 replies,
has 3 voices, and was last updated by qigley
2 years, 4 months ago.

Topic Details
Forum: ProScreener: Market Scanners & Detection
Language: English
Started: 10/18/2023
Status: Active
Attachments: 1 files
Logo Logo
Loading...
Do you like cookies? 🍪 We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. (Learn more)
©2026 ProRealCode - Trading & Coding with ProRealTime™