Discussing the strategy VECTORIAL DAX (M5)

Forums › ProRealTime English forum › ProOrder support › Discussing the strategy VECTORIAL DAX (M5)

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,239 total)
1 2 3 4 5 … 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83
  • 12/15/2020 at 10:16 AM #153808
    Tanou

    Hello everyone 🙂

     

    Glad to read you!

     


    @Paul    , I just tried and the equity curve is way worse on my side… And what is your option for those trades? I tried but it alos cuts too soon some of them which could make way more profit…!

    12/15/2020 at 10:20 AM #153809
    nonetheless

    Hi Tanou, thanks very much for your work on this, it looks promising. Not so sure about your decision to optimize only from June 2016 though, as you have effectively curve fit to that data set. A walk backwards is just as indicative as a walk forwards and unfortunately when your algo is run over the full 1m data the performance drops – basically flat for the period 2012-16.

    You say that you think the past 4 years are indicative of present market conditions, but no one knows what the market is going to do next year; it may well go back to patterns seen in 2014 – in which case this won’t work. My approach would be to do a 70/30 or 80/20 over the full 8 years. As we now have all that data, might as well make use of it.

    Do you by chance have an optimization itf with all the variables set up?

    12/15/2020 at 10:23 AM #153811
    Paul

    here’s the file

    one thing, I saw you’re testing on $2.

    If pipsize is not handled correctly everywhere it also would have different results, so I’ve tested on 1€

     

    12/15/2020 at 10:59 AM #153815
    GraHal
    nonetheless wrote:

    run over the full 1m data

    So you guys are seeing 1 million bars are you?

    I’m seeing same as @vonasi here …

    Vonasi wrote:

    I added a bar counting indicator that also returned the date of the first candle on the chart and I get the following on the SPTRD (SP500):

     

    12/15/2020 at 11:10 AM #153819
    nonetheless

    confess that i didn’t actually count to see if there were truly 1m bars … but when using the historical 1m setting on a 3min chart I get over 8 years of back test (IG Premium).

    1m bars by TF:

    5min = 10 years (limit of tbt data)

    3min = 106 months

    2min = 71 months

    1min = 34 months

    30 sec = 17 months

     

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    avatar Indiana400, avatar GraHal
    12/15/2020 at 11:18 AM #153823
    Roger
    Thanks Tanou for sharing
    Paul wrote:

    winratio goes over 90%(100k) but total results go down a bit, equitycurve looks sweet 500k bars.

    Yes the results seem to be worst when we change it, especially for the OOS period 2012-2015, which is globally positive with Tanou version. Its weird…

    12/16/2020 at 4:30 AM #153901
    Paul

    I havent really looked into this, but it’s interesting to see performance after optimisation if long & short is handled the same way, either with both <> or both crossover/under.

    The equity realised by Tanou will be hard to match.

    It made me curious how my old version with the heuristics engine is performing. I haven’t running in demo. Bad performance 2 weeks before US election, after the 3rd it’s reasonable.

    12/16/2020 at 12:52 PM #153953
    Tanou

    Hello everyone 🙂

     


    @Paul    , what do you mean by “The equity realised by Tanou will be hard to match.”? That you don’t think that the robot could do that or that the strategy is quite good?

     

    12/16/2020 at 4:29 PM #154007
    Nacho

    Good afternoon, I have activated it in demos since November 10, I started with 2 cfds in AUD which amounts to € 1.60 per point.

     

    12/16/2020 at 4:30 PM #154010
    Nacho

    Sorry € 1.20 the point

    12/16/2020 at 5:04 PM #154014
    VinzentVega
    Nacho wrote:

    Good afternoon, I have activated it in demos since November 10, I started with 2 cfds in AUD which amounts to € 1.60 per point.

    Yuu´re Lucky. The Vector had a bad time in the middle of October with big loss.

    12/16/2020 at 5:07 PM #154015
    deletedaccount051022

    Yes, it did, but has since recovered.  I took not an insignificant loss in October, but was pleased to see it have recovered by end of Nov.  Talk about taking the rough with the smooth!  🙂

    12/16/2020 at 5:22 PM #154018
    Paul

    @Tanou  your optimisation is based on tradinghours, therefore the payout is less, but the equitycurve is quite steady from the beginning. It looks good.

    On the HE version, I started to  look at it again. Replacing breakeven & trailingstops with robertogozzi’s, and the angle changed for short to 35, (tested all values within a small range) improved payout with about 2000.

    However I want to have it different, so removed all curvefitting, like market resistance indicator, other exits.

    Changed the trailing-stop to include different values for long & short and results are now close to the same as with the extra code. In progress!

     

    12/16/2020 at 5:28 PM #154020
    Tanou

    @Paul, you did a great job then! 😃

     

    is it possible to get this one to see if I can have a look and maybe helping you improving it? 😃

     

     

    12/16/2020 at 5:56 PM #154027
    Paul

    sure here it is. Hope you can find improvements!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,239 total)
1 2 3 4 5 … 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83

Find exclusive trading pro-tools on ProRealCode Marketplace

Similar topics:
discuss the “late lunch strade dax40 strategy”
discussing the cac40 tuesday long strategy
display of dax we data on dax weekly chart
late lunch trade dax40 strategy
5m ustech 100 strategy
bollinger+fractal strategy idea
changes to weekly reversal fx strategy
classic macd 200ema strategy
coding of a trend following strategy with pullback counter
combining short/long strategies into 1 strategy issue

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login