Trend following strategy, multi market, 30min to 4h

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Trend following strategy, multi market, 30min to 4h

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • #104431

    Hello,

     

    I developed this strategy that follows the trend (buy and sell). It’s based on 3 conditions only related with the exponential moving average.

    It works better without target and stop loss.

    It keeps positions open for a minimum of 24h.

     

    You can backtest this strategy with different timeframe, but you’ll have to adapt R :
    – R=200 for TF=30min
    – R=100 for TF=1h
    – R=50 for TF=2h
    – R=25 for TF=4h

     

    It gives good results with all the major indices and forex (TF=2H) :
    – DAX, GL=3.07 (90 trades)
    – FTSE, GL=2.20 (81 trades)
    – CAC, GL=2.07 (86 trades)
    – US500, GL=2.41 (69 trades)
    – DOW, GL=1.83 (69 trades)
    – US100, GL=1.65 (72 trades)
    – ASX, GL=1.54 (96 trades)
    – EURUSD, GL=1.95 (91 trades)
    – GBPUSD, GL=1.43 (82 trades)
    – USDJPY, GL=1.27 (75 trades)

     

    These results are with the exact same code for each market with a timeframe=2H

    You can easily get a better GL for each market by changing few settings, but the initial idea was to use the same code for all markets.

     

    These backtests are with no spreads, and no fees, how much fees we can expect for 1 contrat on one of this market for a duration of 1 week open?

     

    What are your ideas to improve this strategy?

     

    Jérémy

     

    #104443

    Oops, wrong section, anybody can move my post to “ProOrder support” please?

    #104445

    Done.

    #104472

    Hi Jeremyben,

    Thanks for sharing this strategy. It proves that a simple strategy can be performant.
    I have tries to tweak the different variables but I couldn’t lower the drawdown. In fact the drawdown is due to the fact that we are keeping our position for one day.
    To improve the performance MM3 can be removed. It allows to double the number of trades.

    #104475

    By removing MM3, I get nearly the same number of trades. How did you get the double?

     

    The effect I see without MM3 are:

    • longer time spent in market (x1.5, an it reaches 100% time in market if we remove MM2 and MM3)
    • a slight improvement of GL

     

    And yes the main problem of this strategy is its potential huge DD because of no stop. How can we solve it?

    We are loosing performance by using any StopLoss. I’ve tried the trailing stop, but it doesn’t help. This strategy bet on a return of the market for the loosing trades so that make sense any Stoploss will go against the strategy.

    #104480

    I got the double with dax that works very well with this strategy.
    Maybe with a volatility filter you can improve drawdown but I don’t think significantly.

    On dax I had these conclusions:
    – The biggest lost are always with trades lasting more than 2 days
    –  A trade with a mfe of 0 will always end with a lost and one with a mae of 0 a win

    This strategy can be profitable if you have the necessary capital to handle the drawdown.
    It can be a good manual strategy but is too risky to be automated.

     

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login