One hour later … and after typing a post which headed the wrong direction, this is the short answer :

Because your trailing condition is not correct, you set the Set Stop Profit right away, and thus the exit happens right away.

if high-tradeprice(1) > 100 and longonmarket then

that.

Killer, I am sure you are not satisfied with this answer, so just let me know – then I may post that more vague text, but which will be explanatory just the same. But in brief (what I think of it) :

It comes down to using the Set Stop Profit on the wrong side of the price. You must first have profit, in order to set it Under the price. But because your condition is not correct, the command gets active right away and “profit” is taken accordingly.
Add to this that the documentation is written out of sufficient context, and you may be using the command wrongly. But I can’t be sure about that.
In any event, see below; the white line is your trailingsl. And you can see how it starts under the (entry) price. And the vagueness in all : let it start above the price does not work either. So it is the moment where you start using it, not being correct. And this just comes down to the If condition (see above) not being correct.

if onmarket then
  graphonprice trailingsl
endif

I made a new .itf I originally wanted to post, but *that* could be with the wrong assumptions on what you actually want to achieve. So I better not post that.

Regards,
Peter

image_2024-01-06_065946624.png

Please remember what I said : this earlier made post will only make it more vague. But it gives some insight and from there you should be able to get it working.
Main culprit remains : That If condition does not work out for you and now the Set Stop Profit will work against you.
Ask questions when needed.

I don’t know exactly what the idea is behind Set Stop Profit, but it does not work out the way you use it (also see below at the Disclaimer).
https://www.prorealcode.com/documentation/set-stop-profit/

The other day someone was fighting with Set Target Loss ? same thing I guess (but I did not try that). I think it was @ashehzi.

The commands feel a bit “bad” to me . So what you you mean set a Stop for profit ? we set TARGETs for profit. And we set STOPS for loss (protection).
I never used these commands, so undoubtedly I am wrong all over. Fact is, that it just does not work as advertised (which is without further context).

In between the lines 😉
I myself can be easily confused by the fact that I would use Set Stop Loss for the exact same, with the notice that I would set this when in profit. Notice that this just works (well) and that Set Stop Profit with that is redundant or not understood by me.

So Killer, try the one attached. See at the bottom.

If OnMarket then
  set target $Profit ProfitParam  //80
endif

Now it works exactly as you would expect it. **
Notice that I (re)activated the spread, so that you can even better check that it works. Play with that; set it to e.g. 40 and see the results.

Mind the ProfitParam I added for even easier checking.

The Set $Profit vs Set Profit does not make a difference in this 1 point instrument case (1 point is 1 euro).

I could be important that I tried this under V12, but I don’t think so, because you could not get it to work yourself either. However :

Your trailing is not working well. See the white GraphOnPrice line (line 60). But I am sure you will easily solve that now, now it starts to work in the base.

**): But it depends; the sheer fact that you use it under the condition of the trailing, suggests that you want to use it under the price, so that if the price drops the exit occurs and the profit is taken. This makes the culprit one thing only : your trailing condition is not right (and it isn’t).

Regards,
Peter

Disclaimer : I feel that Set Stop Profit can be used differently (like we can set Stops or Limits at the wrong side of the Price) and possibly this is related to having more contracts (or better : cumulated orders), but Nicolas’ documentation does not talk about that. And in any event without further context, the command as described places the exit at the wrong side of the Price and goes out immediately.
So to me it feels like Set Stop Profit can be used to lock in profit (price drops too much, so let’s take some of the profit). Thus from the documentation (I only read Nicolas’s) :

Allows you to place a stop at X points / % / € / unit above the entry price of the position (for a buy order or below for a sellshort order).

It would imply that you first are above the entry price and then at a certian stage apply the Set Stop Profit.

MeinHandelssystem2.itf image_2024-01-06_063025005.png

killerplatuze wrote:

Thx, but this is exactly what i have done:

Thank you. That is good to know. So this takes out the confusion in the post I wrote at first, as it is now known that it is your intention indeed to take the profit under the price.
I am out for a bit of shopping and when back I will try to make it work for you.

N.b.: Possibly you took this code from some regularly posted trailing code ? if so, can you give a link to that ?

PeterSt wrote:

to take the profit under the price.

For Longs:

Yes this is my understanding, Set Stop Profit, example … profit currently at 100, lets preserve some of that if / when price falls back, I be happy to exit with 80 profit. 

Similar (but kinda opposite logic) to Set Target Loss, example … Loss currently at 100, let’s see if I can get out with less loss if price rises, I be happy to exit at 20 loss.  

GraHal wrote:

Similar (but kinda opposite logic) to Set Target Loss, example … Loss currently at 100, let’s see if I can get out with less loss if price rises, I be happy to exit at 20 loss.

And now we need a matrix of  all these commands which will override each other. Example (made up and not tested) : A Set Stop Loss will not allowed to be combined with a Set Stop Profit. … Because they are both pending stops (?).
And will the Set Target Loss be a Stop or a Limit ? … that kind of things.

Could be quite undoable to work out, because only in practice you will be able to find out for real (practice : Live or Demo, and possibly not even everything for Demo). I mean, only last week I found myself to be a happy camper to be able to graph (thus in backtest) a pending stop for real so that it would match reality. But I could only do that because I had reality in the first place (from past Live trades).