Smoothed Repulse rejected in ProBacktest

soulintact · 2020-08-19T19:00:52+00:00

//Smoothed Repulse // parameters: SRLength=5 Bull=(exponentialAverage[5*SRLength](((3*Close)-(2*lowest[SRLength](low))-Open[SRLength])/Close*100)) Bear=(exponentialAverage[5*SRLength]((Open[SRLength]+(2*highest[SRLength](high))-(3*Close))/Close*100)) SmoothedRepulse=(Bull-Bear) BullSmoothedRepulse=(SmoothedRepulse 0) Since a week the code above is rejected when I try to ProBack test. Any ideas? Thanks

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

Author

Posts
08/19/2020 at 8:00 PM #142076 quote
soulintact
Participant

Senior
```
//Smoothed Repulse
// parameters:
SRLength=5
 
Bull=(exponentialAverage[5*SRLength](((3*Close)-(2*lowest[SRLength](low))-Open[SRLength])/Close*100))
Bear=(exponentialAverage[5*SRLength]((Open[SRLength]+(2*highest[SRLength](high))-(3*Close))/Close*100))
SmoothedRepulse=(Bull-Bear)

BullSmoothedRepulse=(SmoothedRepulse<2.6)
BearSmoothedRepulse=(SmoothedRepulse>0)
```
Since a week the code above is rejected when I try to ProBack test. Any ideas? Thanks

Pro-Backtest-error-message.png
08/19/2020 at 8:18 PM #142078 quote

robertogozzi
Moderator

Legend

I guess you are using v10.3, while

https://www.prorealcode.com/documentation/smoothedrepulse/

is supported by v11.

soulintact thanked this post

08/20/2020 at 5:07 AM #142084 quote

soulintact
Participant

Senior

Thank you Robert, that is correct. I use 10.3, but the code string has been working for months until last week. That is why I am a bit puzzled.

08/20/2020 at 8:28 AM #142086 quote

robertogozzi
Moderator

Legend

Actually the issue is that you are using SmoothedRepulse as a variable name that is now a reserved keyword.

Rename it SmoothedRepulseX.

soulintact thanked this post

08/20/2020 at 5:24 PM #142156 quote

soulintact
Participant

Senior

Thank you Roberto. Spot on, that did it. THANKS!!
Author

Posts