ScalpMaster 10S
- This topic has 66 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by
.
-
Update v3
– indicator included in the code and not called anymore, in order to easily optimize pivotbar and lookback values (thanks to Grahal for the idea)
– included security exits when bullish become bearish and bearish become bullish
– new graphic with optimizable values highlightedDon’t need further days on demo testing to understand that this was highly optimized for the last week and now it’s trash (someone said short timeframe system problematics?)
That’s why i’m working on v4 with the intent to have it FULLY working under machine learning; created 1s 5s and 10s to run for the rest of the week.I will update you on results, for now here’s the differences between the non dynamic and dynamic version on DOW, looks promising?
4 users thanked author for this post.
Update v4
– full implementation of machine learning on EVERY value, the only thing you have to change is positionsize (big thanks to Paul). Values reset each day in order to have no correlation with some kinds of optimization of the dynamic values adjustement.
– bearish and bullish detection converted from exponential average to moving averageBacktest on positionsize=0.2, resulting on a 50% gain
Still trying to manage some holes in position opening before considering it for demo forward testing (see attached)
@Francesco Hi that pic looks promising!
a little thing I prefer myself. You have flatbefore/after.
Perhaps use i.e. time < 21u to open a trade at the latest and flat after 22u.
Nice to see you took the ML code and implemented it! For me I didn’t have the success I wanted with it so far.
with losses, I looked at the bar when the signal came. If it closed at the high and it gave a short signal then it is ignored, because that’s a sign of conflict. It removed some bad trades in my strategy (5s).
Looking forward to your update!
1 user thanked author for this post.
This will be my last version of this, it worked good through past two weeks but this one went particulary bad.
I don’t know if it’s a moment or it’s a failing system, but for sure i don’t think i will never put low tf systems on my live account; maybe they’re gold miner or maybe not, but there is too much instability despite the complete automation with the ml.You are free to put it in demo forward if you like, to play with ml values to let it perform better, or put it into live account if you like to risk, but i’m just sharing this for knowledge purposes.
(If you want to play with it, i found that splitting the system into s/r bounce and s/r breakout versions can perform good, maybe running it together)
3 users thanked author for this post.
That’s a shame, I was really hoping the ML could save it, but as you know I came to the same conclusion about <1m TFs
Personally, I think 2m is the sweet spot. It’s what I’ve always used for day-trading and it just feels right to me. Allows for early entry and no long wait for the trail to start. 1 year back test is not great but at least it can be considered as “meaningful”.
Oh well, on to the next one. Have a great weekend.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Find exclusive trading pro-tools on 
