Thanks wing. Oh man, I have to confess that really sucks!( Sorry for my bad language.) Why is this?

As you said wing, high, low, close, open are also arrays and it is so easy to fetch a point in the past. We all see it when using them … high[34] = high[78]  … two points easy compared.

It is all about fetching a defined point in the past and working with these points.

It could be any point, a fraktal high …or …. if high[3]<high[2] and low[2]>low[3] … you name it.

Is it so difficult to program Arrays into existence? I mean, arrays are so useful, and to finally answer your question, in my case I want to use high and low-fraktal points and compare them

with other high and low-fraktal points, or use math on them. But there would be plenty of other points I would be using if I could, believe me!

Yet, it is a huge act doing this by using different functions etc. … you need counters, because you have to count everything from your last candle to get this and that high etc. …. and I haven’t been able

to do this with the complete data series … you just can’t save a point in this elegant way an array is doing it. Well, actually you can’t save points in the past at all, because on the next

candle, when your defined point appears, the old point gets lost. That’s the core problem. So you always have to count … and count … and count … and count …

Right now, I can only fetch a certain amount of points in the past, yet which I have to define previously. Means, I EVEN have to know IN ADVANCE, how many points I am going to use, because once you

put a variable in existence you have to use it otherwise you get an error. All of this is a lot of work and doesn’t even catch up close to arrays, where you just write one word. And that is really killing me, because

I am not able to transfer my different trading ideas into reality.

Well, can at least anybody tell me if there are going to be arrays in the near future? That would be great to know. And if yes, when would that be; timeframe. I really need them badly.

Thanks