Pathfinder swing TS

Viewing 15 posts - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 2,005 total)

← 1 2 3 … 114 115 116 … 132 133 134 →

Author

Posts
11/08/2017 at 4:39 PM #51978 quote

dajvop
Participant

Master

PA and PA with accumulation v3 for Nov2. Take notice that the future for PA expires on Nov 29.

O-jay8 and wp01 thanked this post

Pathfinder-Nov2-PA-v3.jpg Pathfinder-Nov2-PA-v3.itf Pathfinder-Nov2-PA-v3-acc.jpg Pathfinder-Nov2-PA-v3-acc.itf

11/09/2017 at 3:45 AM #52018 quote

ozz87
Participant

Senior

Yeah. I’m still here. Not sure what to trade at the moment so I’m just running a few of the ones you made for nov1, none has taken position though.

Optimized FTSE and OMX for nov2.

dajvop, wp01 and O-jay8 thanked this post

Pathfinder-Nov2-FTSE-v3.itf ftse_nov2.png Pathfinder-Nov2-OMX-v3.itf omx_nov2.png

11/09/2017 at 8:46 AM #52028 quote

wp01
Participant

Master

CAC and STXE Nov2 V3:

dajvop and O-jay8 thanked this post

Pathfinder-CAC-Nov2-V3.itf report-CAC-Nov2-V3.png Pathfinder-STXE-Nov2-V3.itf report-STXE-Nov2-V3.png

11/09/2017 at 10:35 AM #52068 quote

wp01
Participant

Master

MIB and IBEX Nov2 V3. The DD for the MIB is a bit high. Post it anyway so you can decide for yourself.

dajvop and O-jay8 thanked this post

Pathfinder-MIB-Nov2-V3.itf report-MIB-Nov2-V3.png Pathfinder-IBEX-Nov2-V3.itf report-IBEX-Nov2-V3.png

11/09/2017 at 11:43 AM #52096 quote

dajvop
Participant

Master

Another bug when trying to do more than 1 period in v3:

When changing maxCandlesWith and WithoutProfit then you affect the results of the previous period also.

O-jay8 and wp01 thanked this post

11/09/2017 at 11:49 AM #52097 quote

O-jay8
Participant

Veteran

Hi Guys,

Thanks for the contribution again. I still use V2 for now.
I try to upload my algos at the end of the week.

Best regards

wp01 thanked this post

11/09/2017 at 11:50 AM #52098 quote

wp01
Participant

Master

I suggest we optimize in V3 just the period we need and continue to the next period by set “trade in period = 0”.

When there eventually will be a solution in the future we only have to copy the data to the new version.

Probably some line needs to be added that separates the former periods from the current periods.

Maybe i wake up tomorrow and have the answer…….:-)

11/09/2017 at 12:13 PM #52107 quote

dajvop
Participant

Master

@Patrick unfortunately it is not enough to set Trade in period = 0 you also have to comment out the maxcandle lines on the previous period and probably optimise the PeriodThirdMA of the previous period also. 2 is good, but not optimal. An alternative is to use a modified v3 with only 1 period.

wp01 thanked this post

11/10/2017 at 9:59 AM #52199 quote

wp01
Participant

Master

HS Nov2 V3 and HSCHIN Nov2 V3. Both with accumulation.

In the HSCHIN version are in 2011 a couple of zero trades. Probably not correct so the results are a bit less than presented.

Kind regards,

dajvop thanked this post

Pathfinder-HS-Nov2-V3.itf Pathfinder-HSCHIN-Nov2-V3.itf report-HS-Nov2-V3-with-acc..png report-HSCHIN-Nov2-V3-with-acc..png

11/10/2017 at 10:25 AM #52210 quote

dajvop
Participant

Master

AEX and NIFTY with a modified version of v3 without scrolling and no other PeriodThirdMA to disturb the results.

wp01 and O-jay8 thanked this post

Pathfinder-Nov2-AEX-v3mod.jpg Pathfinder-Nov2-NIFTY-v3mod.jpg Pathfinder-Nov2-NIFTY-v3mod.itf

11/10/2017 at 12:38 PM #52224 quote
O-jay8
Participant

Veteran
Hi Guys,

I wanted to compare all the versions. I did it with 4 different ones for Cacao for Nov2
- Reiners latest original V3
- Dajvops modified one
- The one Ozz87 sent yesterday with the FTSE
- My V2 version
I used the same paremeters. We have everywhere different results but I have to say all V3 versions are quite close.
The V2 results are worse than the V3 results in the case of Cacao.

I did the same briefly for FTSE Nov2 as well and there the V2 results where better than the all V3. Also for FTSE, the overall results where quite close.
See attached the screenshots.It is very confusing as we all use different versions or modified ones. That doesnt make it easier.

Comparison-CC-NOV-2-DV-Reiner.jpg PF-Nov2-CC-v3-DV.itf PF-FY-CC-Nov2-V3-Reiner.itf
11/10/2017 at 12:39 PM #52228 quote

O-jay8
Participant

Veteran

Here the other two algos

PF-Nov2-CC-v3-OB.itf PF-CC-Nov2-V2-dv-ok.itf

11/10/2017 at 12:40 PM #52231 quote

O-jay8
Participant

Veteran

I forgot one screenshot.

Comparison-CC-NOV-2-ok-OB.jpg

11/10/2017 at 2:13 PM #52249 quote

dajvop
Participant

Master

Seems as though AEX.itf didn’t attach:

wp01 thanked this post

Pathfinder-Nov2-AEX-v3mod-1.jpg Pathfinder-Nov2-AEX-v3mod.itf

11/10/2017 at 2:20 PM #52252 quote

dajvop
Participant

Master

@O-jay8

I know. It is a bit confusing and frustrating. We can’t very well try to optimise each instrument for every 4 versions in use to see which one is most favourable. Either we agree on 1 version to use or continue as before and use the version each person favours for optimisation.
Author

Posts