Hi Arno, For me, it’s against my religion to average my losses, sorry. I think it can work ONLY if you have a very high % of winning trade (in the past, but who can predict the future) The problem is what I said to Reiner before on my previous post : Pathfinder take more position than it could (depending on, the risk). If it works, no problem, you’re rich, but if you lose you cry I think (it’s my opinion, not a critical), that this booster to 10 positions (if I remember) is too dangerous and against the Van Tharp theory. This afternoon I had a little bit time to code different suggestions I spoke to Reiner 1/ Add position ONLY if you are after the trailing stop = pyramid trading I code a simple strategy DAX ut15 Spread=1 and test it As you will see on the pictures With this system you have higher winning trade, higher ratio and you’re less in the market (and so less expensive) ! +8.34 % vs +7.91 % It need to be confirm but seems promising 2/ Add an Alembert Martingale (to the basic code) (with maxposition depending on the risk) It seems you win not more and with higher drawdown and you’re more in the market I think it can be optimize (Trailing stop and so on)…But not sure it could be a good option +7.02 % I will test other suggestions when I will have time and say to you the results Have fun Zilliq
.
.
