oil-10min-hammernegated-pattern-strategy

Forums › ProRealTime English forum › ProOrder support › oil-10min-hammernegated-pattern-strategy

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 94 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
  • 10/23/2017 at 11:49 AM #50301
    StantonR

    I am in South Africa so its GMT + 2

    10/24/2017 at 12:04 PM #50375
    Leo

    Has someone else tested in other markets?

     

    11/04/2017 at 4:04 PM #51476
    Kenneth Kvistad

    This strategy seems til not reform well at all in crudeoil. Anton Else experience the same?

    03/05/2019 at 5:10 PM #92906
    Marlon

    Hey there

    I’ve tested the strategy on Oil and it looks like it’s not really performing well.

    Do I have to pay attention to certain settings?

     

    03/05/2019 at 5:44 PM #92910
    Nicolas

    The strategy has been developed almost 2 years ago, it certainly needs some readjustment over the last behavior of crude oil price.

    06/21/2019 at 8:31 AM #101136
    solar

    It was written that hammerupmegated: the max of Open/Close of current bar should be smaller than the min of previous bar’s Open/Close.

    I wonder how would it be possible for the hammerupnegated part. If the market is trading 24hrs, I guess the open price should always equal the close price of the previous bar? (except gaps may appear after session break)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar 25sonalgo
    06/26/2019 at 9:13 AM #101422
    solar

    Recent observation shows this strategy is still working well on 15 TF. However, would anymore test it on 200k bar please?

    Another observation is that the signal often occurs during non-volatile period and price did not often trend in the right direction immediately. Does it mean hammernegated is not a strong signal to open a position, while the tight stop profit saves its live?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar RICHI71
    10/22/2019 at 8:47 AM #110788
    RICHI71

    Yes still working well on 15 min TF and on the last 200k bars with the original Francesco’s code

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    avatar Francesco78, avatar reb, avatar Edmond
    11/28/2019 at 12:31 PM #113833
    rejo007

    hi francesco,

    i have work on your strategy and found an interessant think.

    are you already on this forum to speak about this?

    thanks

    11/28/2019 at 12:33 PM #113834
    Francesco78

    @rejo007 Sure, what did you find?

    11/28/2019 at 12:43 PM #113838
    rejo007

    I have try dax, cac40, dow, nasdaq, spain, …

    with x = between 0.85 and 0.95 (depend volatility of index)

    and 5 or 6 at place of 3 on this line (the same for down)

    hammerup = min(open[1],close[1])>high[1]–(high[1]–low[1])/5 //and timeok

    timeframe: 15min

     

    and without optimisation, it’s run very good (not a lot of trade but …)

    with bitcoin and other too.

     

    wath do you think?

    just a problem with index italia (great loss, so i think that a stoploss more close could be better )

    11/28/2019 at 12:45 PM #113839
    Francesco78

    Thank you for your work! Would you be able to post here some of your results and codes?

    Many thanks

    Francesco

    11/28/2019 at 1:06 PM #113845
    rejo007

    could you send the line to add to the strategy to have a SL fix?

    So i could test with this and send good result

    thanks

    11/28/2019 at 5:40 PM #113863
    rejo007

    x 0.85 or 0.95

    and

    hammerup = min(open[1],close[1])>high[1]–(high[1]–low[1])/5 or 6//and timeok

    11/28/2019 at 5:42 PM #113868
    rejo007

    with italy, DD is high

    un SL could solve this?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 94 total)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Find exclusive trading pro-tools on ProRealCode Marketplace

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login