How to find good value when using WF optimization?

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support How to find good value when using WF optimization?

  • This topic has 28 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by avatarModa.
Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • #128090

    ok thanks @Francesco, i will double check

    #128091

    full output attached…

    #128171

    In hundreds of rts that ive done, i’ve never seen a 20 5 and 21 5 having an higher score then 10 10.
    That’s why i told you to check it better and told that it was unusual @nonetheless

    Anyway, this could be an ecception, maybe synonymous of a good system 🙂

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #128203

    never seen a 20 5 and 21 5 having an higher score then 10 10

    thanks Francesco. I never use 20,5 so wasn’t aware of any comparison between that and 10,10.

    #129480

    Guys,

    Need eyes here, is this too much unbalanced results ?

    Cheers

    #129484

    Well, that truly is an unusual result. Either you’ve written the perfect code or something has gone wrong in the VRT.

    Have you got this Excel sheet? #107211

    It automatically graphs the results so it’s easier to read.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #129486

    Yes using the last version made by @Paul

    Here it is and the code is yours i’m working on MoD Dax/Dow

     

    #129489

    Having no results in the third one means both gain and % curve went negative, am i right?
    Also, the 100% gain curve in the 10 10 is nearly impossible, especially when in 20 5 and 21 5 go negative.
    There’s something inusual for sure 🙂

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #129490

    Did you sort the average gain from low to high? It looks very peculiar. Almost impossible to get a 100% score there.

    If it’s my algo, then it’s definitely wrong! These are the results I got for DAX v2.

    #129494

    Obviously, thanks for your time @Francesco

    It looks suspicious… for the 21/5 i did not run it

    Yes i sorted results … i found out sorry for the noise i made a mistake sorting data

     

    #129496

    If you want to share your code i can take a look for you

    #129497

    sure i post it in the right place where it belongs in the MoD post #129503

    #129506

    The problem was in the robustness tester code, replace it with this

    I just did the 10 10 and the results are “normal”, so also 20 5 and 21 5 will surely work 🙂

    #129507

    Many thanks @Francesco  😉

Viewing 14 posts - 16 through 29 (of 29 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login