Yes Maz maybe I need my own Thread on this … I piggybacked onto Stantons / this Thread as it is same / similar basis.
I have started my own Thread for Algo based on this structure in the past a few times, but I am not good a coding and was reliant on others and the Threads died.
See attached all 3 Trades are losing now and price is edging below 23.6% retracement … may go on to a 50 or 61.8% then bang stop losses triggered and another 3 losers.
Doubly annoying thing is there is a stop loss for one of the trades sitting just above the 61.8% retrace so the trade will exit and then almost certainly go back up again after hitting the 61.8 zone a few times.
And this after 2 obvious ranges followed by breakouts … see attached.
GraHal
I may be in luck and it will be scenario attached … with the different 0% and 100% levels … looks like it may due to support / 2 price rejections at 61.8%
Looks like attached may be the 61.8 level it is respecting on the 15 min Chart … higher TF Elliott Waves override lower TF waves.
I also did a manual trade Long to get back the loss on the Algo which was stopped out earlier this afternoon.
GraHal
Hi Grahal
I am facing similar problems with some of my other strategies.
I am looking to check the length of the bar to see if its greater than 20 points. This signifies there is a big break out and possible a follow on.
So if the bar is above 20 points in length I dont go in on next bar then wait 2 or 3 bars later to enter.
how does that sound.
Hi Stanton
Let me know how it works?
Alternative thoughts … wait up to 10 bars all in same direction of and including the ‘> 20 point bar’ and including any bars before the ‘> 20 point bar’ … that way the short term trend should be ready for a retrace??
Hi Stanton,
I’ve put together an Engulfing strategy on EURUSD 4H (Long only). It’s not based on yours but maybe it can help you to bring some new ideas.
// EURUSD 4H
//SPREAD 2 pips
//victormork @ prorealcode.com
// ===========Engulfing trading============= \
// ====================================== \
// :: System Parameters ----------------- //
DEFPARAM CumulateOrders = False
DEFPARAM Preloadbars = 200
// ====================================== \
// :: Optimizations ----------------------//
atr = averagetruerange[20](close)
profitATRmultiple = 1
sl = 50
tradingtime = currenttime > 080000 and currenttime < 220000
//tried but no positiv effect on result
//malong = average[20] //20
//mashort = average[70] // 7
//strength = rsi[14](close)
//rsilonglevel = 50
//rsishortlevel = 30
// ====================================== \
// :: Indicator logic---------------------//
// :: Engulfing setup ================= \
body=close-open
abody=abs(body)
if range>0 then
ratio=abody/range
else
ratio=0
endif
bodytop=max(open, close)
bodybottom=min(open, close)
longcandle= (ratio>0.01) // 0.001
// ====================================== \
// :: Bullish Engulfing signal------------//
b1 = (body[1]<0)
b2 = (body>0)
b3 = (bodybottom<bodybottom[1])
b4 = (bodytop>bodytop[1])
b5 = longcandle
b10 = b1 and b2 and b3 and b4 and b5
// ====================================== \
// :: Execution Long ---------------------//
if b10 and tradingtime then
Buy 1 contract at market
endif
// ====================================== \
// :: Bearish signal--------------------- //
//s1 = (body[1]>0)
//s2 = (body<0)
//s3 = (bodybottom<bodybottom[1])
//s4 = (bodytop>bodytop[1])
//s5 = longcandle
//s6 = strength > rsishortlevel
//s10 = s1 and s2 and s3 and s4 and s5 and s6
// ====================================== \
// :: Execution Short --------------------//
//if s10 and tradingtime then
//sellshort 1 contract at market
//endif
// ====================================== \
// :: Stop and target-------------------- //
set target pprofit (atr * profitATRmultiple)/pointsize
set stop ploss sl
Hi Victor
Thanks for this.
I see that it is only looking for the engulfing setup and time in order to enter the trade.
What I am looking for is one more confluence to ensure a higher probability of a reversal.
Ie Trend lines or Pivot points.
Hi Stanton,
Yes I saw that you tried to find an additional criteria and I’ve tried too but so far without success. I’ll let you know if I find something.