Can't get Trade Size to be governed by Machine Learning code

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Author

Posts
05/01/2020 at 2:21 PM #129221 quote

Bard
Participant

Master

I’m wondering, can trade size can’t be governed by a “ValueZ” Machine Learning algo? Only so far I’ve been able to apply the ML code to
everything from Renko boxsizes, Bollinger band periods, Take profit and pLoss amounts, but just not trade size? The MLx3 itf can be found here:
https://www.prorealcode.com/topic/machine-learning-in-proorder/page/26/#post-129120

Also we learnt on the Machine Learning forum: https://www.prorealcode.com/topic/machine-learning-in-proorder/
that using a ValueZ for trailing stop amounts was giving great fantasy equity curves because the PRT tick by tick backtest doesn’t “handle”
these stops accurately. Is that also the case for pLoss? Will the results from a ValueZ governed pLoss be accurate and really be tick by tick?

Cheers,

05/08/2020 at 10:30 AM #130579 quote

Bard
Participant

Master

Does PRT allow Machine Learning optimisation code to be applied to position size?

Can we trust pLoss results from ML systems? Can we trust them at all bearing in mind the issues with trailing stops and tick by tick tests?
Author

Posts

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Login your account

Can't get Trade Size to be governed by Machine Learning code

ProOrder: Automated Strategies & Backtesting

New Reply

Author

Bard @brad Participant

Summary

This topic contains 1 reply,
has 1 voice, and was last updated by Bard
5 years, 9 months ago.

Topic Details

Forum:	ProOrder: Automated Strategies & Backtesting
Language:	English
Started:	05/01/2020
Status:	Active
Attachments:	No files

Loading...