Breakeven- en trailingstop on different securities & indexes & forex

Viewing 5 posts - 76 through 80 (of 80 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #138710 quote
    zilliqzilliq
    Participant
    Master

    Hi Paul,

    In my experience (I work a lot on MAE and MFE), as you can see on the french forum, I didn’t find something interestring, but I could be wrong

    Ok, let’s try with trailing/BE and not as promise

    #138711 quote
    zilliqzilliq
    Participant
    Master

    Well it’s on the run,

    I use a simple crossing average strategy

    f is the number of step before closing the trade

    f=1 then R/R=1

    f>1 then we have a trailing stop and on the first step=BE R/R>1

    c= the step in pip (EUR/USD 1 mn 100 000 units 3000 comb).

    Of course no partial exist = only ONE exit

    [attachment file=”138712″]

    2020-07-08_10h04_12.jpg 2020-07-08_10h04_12.jpg
    #138713 quote
    zilliqzilliq
    Participant
    Master

    Done !

    It confirms what I said previsously

    See the pictures

    As you see : The total gain is quite the same between f=1=No BE or f>1 with Trailing stop and BE

    When f=1 the % of winning trade is higher compare when f>1

    But when f=1 the average gain is less important = you win more / trade when f>1 (but remember we have less winning trades)

    In conclusion, as I said before and to reduce my stress notably…I use generally f=1 with No Trailing Stop and No Breakeven who seems to be unuseful

    This is MY experience and MY tests, may be you can do yours to compare

    Have a nice day

    Zilliq

    [attachment file=”138714″]

    [attachment file=”138715″]
    [attachment file=”138716″]

    2020-07-08_10h16_52.jpg 2020-07-08_10h16_52.jpg 2020-07-08_10h17_19.jpg 2020-07-08_10h17_19.jpg 2020-07-08_10h17_39.jpg 2020-07-08_10h17_39.jpg
    #138747 quote
    zilliqzilliq
    Participant
    Master

    One another important thing @paul

    The more f is high, less transaction you have, and for a better optimization we need a lot of transactions (The more is better)

    One other reason for f=R/R=1

    Bye

    #138748 quote
    PaulPaul
    Participant
    Master

    hi zilliq

    if you have 1% stoploss & 1% profittarget and being long, there’s no action on the same signals for long in that 2% range, which could be very poor.

    it’s likely more curvefitted and less robust, but depends how the code is written.

    With my little project I’ve made progress & is compleet, but it’s not good enough to use it.

    I like the idea to use support & resistance in a strategy so that it being more dynamic with smaller losses & faster profits & reversals on tops or bottoms optional.

    Have not used breakeven in my codes but a percentage trailingstop I do use atm.

    Take care

    Paul

Viewing 5 posts - 76 through 80 (of 80 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
ProRealAI ProRealAI New

Stuck on this ProBuilder code?

Describe what this topic is trying to build, in plain English, and ProRealAI writes the ProRealTime™ indicator, screener or system for you.

Available in 7 languages
Try ProRealAI

Breakeven- en trailingstop on different securities & indexes & forex


ProOrder: Automated Strategies & Backtesting

New Reply
Author
author-avatar
Paul @micky75d Participant
Summary

This topic contains 79 replies,
has 15 voices, and was last updated by PaulPaul
6 years, 3 months ago.

Topic Details
Forum: ProOrder: Automated Strategies & Backtesting
Language: English
Started: 02/05/2019
Status: Active
Attachments: 34 files
ProRealCode ProRealCode
Loading...