breakdown stocks fetcher

Forums › ProRealTime English forum › ProScreener support › breakdown stocks fetcher

Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
1 2
  • 12/19/2019 at 9:59 PM #115273
    Vonasi
    GraHal wrote:

    I don’t get any Criteria sorting

    That’s because there is no sorting criteria shown in () on the last SCREENER line of code. You can’t get something for nothing!

    I think that Francesco Petrone – was getting a little bit confused by what the definition of criteria and how it worked

    12/19/2019 at 10:50 PM #115274
    GraHal
    Vonasi wrote:

    was getting a little bit confused by what the definition of criteria and how it worked

    I was trying to solve  Francesco Petrone riddle … any ideas for why he got numbers in his Criteria column??  I used the same Screener code  that he said he used.

    Doesn’t sound like he would have amended the Screener code so it may be like Nicolas said … an old forked version or a different Screener he was running??

     

     

    12/19/2019 at 11:14 PM #115275
    Francesco

    As i told i am novice but i swear i didn’t amend nothing in the code.. I made some tests, and with the exact same code: with the last version of PRT i get the automatic sorting by criteria as showed in my images in the last page, but with PRT 10.3 there’s no criteria and no automatic sorting.. Really don’t know but doesn’t matter, now i understood how the screener works 😀

    I propose again my question to you guys: What could i evaluate simultaneously to perfect the bullish and bearish breakout search in your opinion?

    Vonasi i saw you analyzed and produced a lot of breakout indicators, there’s something in your opinion that could match with this screener to “confirm” breakouts on forex markets?

    12/19/2019 at 11:24 PM #115276
    Vonasi

    Sorry – I came a little late to this conversation and missed your earlier image showing some sort of criteria sorting. I can’t explain that as it is impossible without anything in () after the SCREENER command.

    As for breakout – I have spent a lot of time investigating it but have not been impressed with any particular idea yet. I spend little time on forex and only try stuff out on it when I am testing casino ideas! I guess at heart I am a mean reversal major indices kind of trader!

    12/19/2019 at 11:29 PM #115277
    Francesco

    No problem Vonasi and thank you for the help, I wish you good luck with indices 😀

    12/20/2019 at 8:43 AM #115283
    Nicolas

    Francesco, I trust you now 🙂 There are indeed sorting numbers in the criteria column in version 11 and I don’t know where do they come and what do they mean! I’ll be inquiring about that today!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    avatar Francesco, avatar GraHal
    12/20/2019 at 9:43 AM #115286
    GraHal

    And now with the full picture, I can sleep 🙂 as to why I got no ‘sorting numbers’ in the Criteria column … I am using v10.3.

    All’s well that ends well, but will be even better if Nicolas finds out why the sorting numbers are showing in v11 … amazing no-one else has highlighted this as surely it can’t be on this Top and Bottom Screener code only??

    12/20/2019 at 11:06 AM #115290
    Francesco

    Uuhh the riddle becomes interesting now… the screeners also seems to work pretty good with the searching of breakouts, maybe re-analyzing it well would be useful for all of us.

    Let me know and thank you again 🙂

    12/20/2019 at 12:33 PM #115301
    Nicolas

    I just had confirmation that these numbers shouldn’t be there when no sorting criteria are present in the code. Those numbers are used internally by ProScreener and should not appear. Thus they will disappear in a next update.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    avatar Francesco, avatar GraHal
    01/11/2020 at 7:31 PM #116457
    Francesco

    Ok, sorry if I come back to this topic again, but I was particularly fascinated by this screener and in the meantime i’m studying about coding. I noticed that after finding the bullish and bearish, the search functions of the 52 week highs and the last three days reach (from line 6 to line 15) seem to not work properly. In fact, even by removing the lines 6 to 15 from the code and starting the screener, it still gives the same results as the “complete code”. As if it only found bearish and bullish through the EMA and nothing more.
    Also, since I trade intraday with forex, a more recent high than 52 week would be better in your opinion? Like two or four weeks.
    Any thoughts?

    01/13/2020 at 9:15 AM #116593
    Nicolas

    The code is working correctly. It is looking for a proximity with a 250 periods lower low or higher high of the current timeframe you are launching the screener. It was designed to be run on a daily timeframe in the first place, so 250 days is almost a year = 52 weeks.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    avatar Francesco
    01/13/2020 at 11:19 AM #116614
    Francesco

    Ok this time it’s really useless to call you into question, I’m still learning and I didn’t understand that 250 refers to the days, thank you very much for your patience 😀

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
1 2

Find exclusive trading pro-tools on ProRealCode Marketplace

Similar topics:
asx leading stocks
automatic trading on ib stocks and etf
backtest stocks ath
best stocks & etf screener
code for ranking found stocks
comparing 2 stocks
exclude stocks too young
how to screen for stocks with 300k overall volume
linking equities/stocks to their sectors/etfs
run a single algo over multiple stocks

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login