Hello Nicolas, good day to all,
I would like to share with you today another way to approach trading, through binary options, and the opportunity that can be represented by his work with Proreal time.
Quite little mentioned here, the treatment of binary options like those proposed by IG market, under the Sprint market tab, suggests an easily measurable potential.
They are clearly quantifiable, as the premium represents 80% of the initial bet. We can thus fix the break from the start as follows: 1.8×56 = 100.8. The generated signal will therefore, on average, bring a success rate on the next candle of 56% to be profitable. This will be where the backtest will take place.
I worked already a lot on signals, capable of generating at the schedules 9:00 – 18:30 approximately this performance of 56%.
Exceeding this threshold reliably and consistently is clearly difficult. I propose to you today to move together on proposals of signals or systems generating more than 56% success on the next candle.
Having worked for a long time on this subject, I share with you today the fruit of this work, to improve on a collaborative way the initial system or to elicit the development of new systems on the same principle. I am confident that the performance will come from sharing and collaboration, in the spirit of Pro real time and its community.
Here are the specifications to be taken into consideration:
Support: sprint market present on the portal IG market.
Development of systems with reselling buying / selling on candle according to the signal only.
In this context, we only observed the success rate of the backtest, as well as the number of orders.
Construction of a screener on the basis of signals, for manual sprint market
Beating these 56% offers definite and exponential prospects with certainty on the basis of a proven model, in which statistics alone would have the right to be cited.
Specifically, you will find below the put and call signals from my searches, the best performers, the results of backtest s associates and a statement of the best result to date.
To this day, my signal still needs confirmation to the “feeling” (trendline, murray, market configuration), to exceed the performance of 56%. The objective is to surpass them only by the statistical model.
So, we push this model even more with modifications? Or are we going on completely different new ones?
I recall the 3 elements to be taken into account:
56% minimum success for the break. At 75%, we would be statistically and infallibly beneficiaries;
A minimum of recurrence to intervene in the MS day markets.
The ut to work are UT1, UT2, UT20, UT60.
Attached files:
The indicators needed to generate the signal (fibo and Heikin-ashi)
The indicators that accompany it (murray and trendline): thank you Nicolas;)
A screenshot
• the signal indicators (sys20 put and call)
The system allowing the backtest (sys20 full signal)
Results on current backtest ut5, 9H-18h – period of 3 months.
- Dax – 55.88% – 5 trades on average / d
- Gbp usd- 51.57% – 2.5 trades on average / d
- Eur usd – 53.29% – 2.5 trades on average / d
- Aud usd – 57, 09% – 2.35 trades / average / d
- Eur jpy – 54.91% – 2.10 trades / average / d
@everyone Ready to take on the challenge?
