The “Winning Pips System”

The “Winning Pips System”

Hello everyone,

I found this strategy called ” Winning Pips System” (you can see it just by searching “winning pips system” on Google).

 The strategy seemed profitable and I wanted to test it.

Disappointment :

– It loses below the H4 timeframe, because of the spread (if there was no spread, it would be winning in H1)

– To be a winner, the take profit must be 2 times more little than the stop loss. However, even with a 1.5 point spread on EUR/USD (see backtest ), the strategy is profitable.

No doubt it is improvable .

It’s your turn !

Share this

Risk disclosure:

No information on this site is investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Trading may expose you to risk of loss greater than your deposits and is only suitable for experienced investors who have sufficient financial means to bear such risk.

ProRealTime ITF files and other attachments : How to import ITF files into ProRealTime platform?

New! PRC is also now on YouTube, subscribe to our channel for exclusive content and tutorials

  1. Adolfo Onrubia • 04/29/2016 #

     Hi Doctrading! 
    I did a backtest and a little change from amplitude*0.5 to amplitude*1.7  (Profit) with this results: :O
    http://www.prorealcode.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/USD-Wining-pips-.png

    • Doctrading • 04/29/2016 #

      Hello. Results are better with amplitude * 0.5Less drawdown, best profit factor on my test.But BEWARE ! You are using the test on EUR/USD, I am using it on EUR/USD MINI-CONTRACT.So you’re not just using n = 2, but n = 20. The drawdown is inacceptable (more than the initial capital).
      Don’t forget also to set the SPREAD.
      Best Regards,

  2. volpiemanuele • 04/29/2016 #

     Hi,
    I have oprimized on EURUSD MINI starting from January 2016.
    Best result with low drawdown:
    TF 3H
    AO = Average[10](medianprice) – Average[32](medianprice)AC = AO – Average[10](AO)
    TF 4H
    AO = Average[5](medianprice) – Average[32](medianprice)AC = AO – Average[5](AO)
    I think to start these strategy in real account…what do you think ?
    Tanks
    Emanuele

  3. volpiemanuele • 04/29/2016 #

    ….i have optimized with 1.5 spread….

  4. Doctrading • 04/29/2016 #

    Hello.It’s not much better, I think.
    Although this strategy is interesting, I don’t find it profitable. My own codes (daily timeframe) make > 25% each year, this one make less than 6% each year…
    I think that the “End of Day USD/JPY” that I did post before is more profitable.

  5. mofiman • 04/29/2016 #

     
    Bonjour à tous,
    Je suis, en général, assez effaré de voir cette course au meilleur backtest, à croire qu’il n’y a pas de traders ! Car le gros problème des backtests, c’est leur fiabilité. Il suffit de décortiquer les ordres “tests” pour s’apercevoir que beaucoup de positions données gagnantes sont en fait …perdantes. Le target profit, s’il est atteint dans le timeframe, considère le trade gagnant, même si le stop loss est atteint avant. On peut donc aller vers beaucoup de désillusions, même avec de bons backtests. Donc avant de se lancer : testez les tests !

  6. Doctrading • 04/29/2016 #

    Bonjour,
    Tu as raison, il faut faire attention à la fiabilité de certains backtests. Le problème du SL et du TP sur la même bougie est bien connu sur ProRealTime, une prochaine version devrait corriger ce problème. Ceux qui comme nous codent régulièrement connaissent bien le problème, nous savons rester critiques devant un backtest “trop parfait”.
    Je vérifie que ce problème n’existe pas sur les backtests que je publie, et avant de me lancer en réel je teste mes stratégies.Après tout, ça fait maintenant 3 ans que j’utilise deux stratégies qui avaient été backtestées sur PRT par mes soins, je m’y suis fiée à la lettre, et ça fait 3 ans que je gagne, je ne vois pas pourquoi je changerais… (stratégies en graphes Daily, jamais d’entrée et sortie sur la même bougie, une seule position à la fois, donc aucun problème pour le backtest). Je pense que > 80% des traders à domicile / amateurs ne peuvent pas en dire autant.
    Belle journée à tous

  7. Duccio • 04/29/2016 #

    Hi DocTrading,
    I’ve backtested your strategy and I notice that 75% of position have been closed in 0 bar.
    Have y0u tested this strategy in real account? The profits are the same of the backtest?
    Thank you so much

  8. Doctrading • 04/29/2016 #

    Hello, 
    No, I don’t use this strategy on real account, because my own strategies (that you can see on my website) in real account are FAR better, and not on forex but on indexes / stocks.
    But I post some codes here, because I’m still looking to making a good forex strategy, so I test different ones.
    Best regards,
    Marc

avatar
Register or

Likes

avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar
Related users ' posts
Matriciel Yes indeed. You have to test this strategy in demo mode for a while before launching it in ...
agamennone m hi,i'm new about this,somebody can explain me how does this strategy works? thanks
luigiR hi, can you explane how to try to launch with pro order? good job
juanj DId some tests using MACD validations on higher timeframes using MTF functionality and unfor...
FREDNC Hi Francesco I tried with :
FREDNC adx[14]>adxmin and adx[14] > adxr[14] and adx[14]>adxmin and adx[14] DIminus[3](clo...
Maik2404 es sind leider nur long Positionen und keine Short zu erkennen.
Maik2404 Vytautas: es bleibt aber nur bei long Auslösungen
ullle73 this one is not a winner, have backtested it on almost all pairs, does not have an edge
Leo Does it opens pending orders?... maybe they were not trigger.
Mattzi Dont know, all i can see is that it opened an order yesterday in backtest but not live. Th...
Jean-Christophe Hello Leo, when running the strategy from 29/12/2015 to 31/08/2018 on ProRealTime Premium, I...
Nicolas Please add a request on forums for any MT4 code conversion, thank you. Follow these easy ste...
mecon I will do so, thank you!
firemyst @mecon, did you ever get one?
apachx Hi. Please, describe the algorithm in words. I want to understand how it works, but for now...
ALE Hello Paul, please visit my website : www.automatictrading.it Thanks Ale
Michaldst Hi! thanks for sharing! Could you tell something about TP and SL conditions?
cryptotips tips Its horrible !!
Wilko In answer to SAM: The Logic of the cover clause containing the same logic as the entry-claus...
JanWd Tried the code, nice concept, seems to work quit well for US/EUR 2hrs, Other markets seems n...
JR1976 Simple and nice code , congrats !!! Seems work well with TIme frame 1 h
juanj The last fractal will be coordinate 1 and the high/low of the candle that generates an angle...
juanj And the point of violation is the close of the candle that violates the line by generating a...
juanj For the latest version of the strategy or to follow updates and developments see the thread ...
poonsl2828 Hi! Francesco I have test it on GBP/USD but it only have a trade on 9 Jun which i backtes...
ullle73 why not use 1h chart? has 95% hitrate
ullle73 i see most of positions are only 1 pip before exit?
imokdesign Hi Everybody, when I look at the strategy I felt the need to implement a Moneymanagement-Sy...
Inertia newlevel then multiplier=multiplier+1 oldlevel=newlevel newlevel=strategyprofit+startequi...
Inertia Hi Bjoern, I was playing around with your code this morning (EUR/USD 5'). Thank you to the...
victormork Hi, I would just like to share my own take on this strategy. I'm using 30 min on EURUSD but ...
mckubik Thanks. I will run a Test. 
poonsl2828 Hi! bjoern May i know what timing should i change for time zone (Singapore (GMT +8:00) ...
Kris75 @Ale Hi Ale, Thanks for this rocking algo ;-) there is though a counter performance in 201...
Kris75 Sorry here is my question: >> how can we explain this and correct it?
Samitha Prasanna Hi ALE, would you be able to provide the values for the below part of the code (time >=1...
Doctrading Hello, Higher timeframes are better. I suggest D1 or H4.Best regards,
Pinkybouh hello, I propose to add another conditions: ie: haussier: close > open and close >...
TheHovisTrader I'd be interested in the actual profit of this - in the example the stop range is at least 2...
Dimi.A Awesome mate.
mora87 Hi David and Nicola, I'd like to share idea with you guys which is related to David's Idea. ...
Nicolas Please ask for custom coding in forums instead.
Naren Yanan what is    diplus  diminus  please
Barney Has anyone tested this algon now when PRT 10.3 was released?
Yngve does anyone know if the issue with the TP/SL is resolved ?
JakeDB Answered my own question....Sorry about this question. 5 positions, take profit at 15, loss ...
maxxb sto facendo girare in demo questa strategia modificata a 10 minuti con stop e profit ottimiz...
Manuel9z Hello, this strategy improves with the SL 30 and the TP 10. I have done backtesting and it w...
Doctrading Hello, As I said, I didn't use spread for the screenshot as I don't trade Gold and I don't ...
smurfy Hi, I had been losing on gold and after I manually go through the 5min chart using IG and w...
eiffel Hi Smurfy, hope you are still there... I would like to help you to write and test the code.
Wilko This code is the work of a simple genius! Profitability lies in simplicity and repetition.
Nicolas Good joke. FYI, you'll find many identified recurring patterns there: http://paststat.com G...
Yngve i added a MA as a filter, that improved the equity curve quit nice actually

Top