Volume analysis – intraday

v10.3
Volume analysis – intraday

I created this simple indicator to gauge volume of opening bars relative to previous days (can specify how many using the variable) – volume is much more meaningful when evaluated relative to prior periods than in isolation in my view. I originally thought it would be a good forward indicator of trend, but there doesn’t appear to be a clear relationship. It’s quite a busy indicator and I would take any suggestions about how to clean it up. Getting rid of the series of points and solid lines that mark the averages and highest volume numbers either side of the histograms would be a good start, but I don’t think PRT will let me do that.

Share this

Risk disclosure:

No information on this site is investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Trading may expose you to risk of loss greater than your deposits and is only suitable for experienced investors who have sufficient financial means to bear such risk.

ProRealTime ITF files and other attachments : How to import ITF files into ProRealTime platform?

PRC is also on YouTube, subscribe to our channel for exclusive content and tutorials

  1. Maxime Baudin • 01/07/2020 #

    Very useful! Thanks Mat, and Happy New Year

  2. nicko • 01/07/2020 #

    Great work. Thank you. However I am having trouble getting it to print in the first bar. If I set timing for US stocks for Stocks it always seems to do the print First Bar +1. I have tried putting the first bar as the one before and this does not help. Any suggestions anyone?

avatar
Register or

Likes

avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar avatar
Related users ' posts
Nicolas
10 years ago
Nicolas
10 years ago
Nicolas Just replace the last line with this : RETURN dm as "Volume Weighted MACD", masignal as "Si...
thomas2004ch I happen to read this article. I would say the formel 'd = maslow - mafast' could be inverse...
Nicolas You are right! but still the picture is looking good. The formula is inverted! dunno why :) ...

Top