Mother of Dragons trading strategy…

Forums ProRealTime English forum ProOrder support Mother of Dragons trading strategy…

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 523 total)
  • #117641

    Ciao Francesco, here’s a second version if you wouldn’t mind backtesting on 200k. MM is disabled but the DrawdownNeededToQuit might still be operative … not sure.

    I added another layer of filters at the 15m level. It performs better than v1 over 100k — higher profit from fewer trades — so curious to know if it’s still just fit it to that data set.

    Dita incrociate…

    #117648

    nonetheless – could you post the code so that we don’t have to download the ITF file please?

    #117649

     

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #117661

    MoDv2 200k

    #117665

    Thanks Francesco … sadly not any better than the first one. Only really works for 2019.

    May need to rethink this. We all know how it ended for the mother of dragons.

    #117666

    Hope the next will not be Oberyn trading strategy 😀

    #117671

    May need to rethink this

    Least it wouldn’t have blown the Account in the 1st 100k bars (as many Systems do for OOS periods).

    Maybe a Filter to prevent trading when Price is ranging and also in a downtrend.

    If you look at the equity curve … in 2017 when price was rising (from Sep 17 to Jan 18) your System made money then lost it when price was in a downtrend (Feb 18 to May 18) then hovered around zero when price was ranging from May 18 until 2019 when it got going again.

    It is worth trying a few tweaks and then if  Franseco tests again over 200k bars.

    But really you need tweak then  optimise else you not know if the tweak worked. How about trying it on 100k x 10 min TF as then back to June 2017 should be included??

    Just a few thoughts anyway.

    #117695

    TBH, I’m inclined to give it a rest until we get v11. 100k just isn’t enough data to work with unless you’re using +1h TFs.

    #119175

    I changed line
    61
    74
    131
    Add a stop from the line
    113
    I would do well a multi position if the position wins.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #119181

    Hey Fifi, a few tweaks and suddenly it looks so much better – thanks for that!

    Your backtest is 200k, yes? How does the curve look for 2017, 2018? The previous version only really came alive in 2019.

    #119190

    and There you go

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #119214

    That is a much better line, steady increase over almost the whole period. I tried to break it into separate long and short but the result is worse; your version works better as one code going both ways. A couple of big losses in Jan/Feb 2020 but over the long term looks like it could work – génial!

    This is another version I had been working on, with a couple of extra filters in the 2h TF to help confirm the primary trend. What do you think? My guess is that yours is probably more stable…

    #119217

    here’s the code:

     

    #119224

    I tried to break it into separate long and short but the result is worse; your version works better as one code going both ways

    For me that would start ringing an alarm bell. If an entry condition and exit condition are good then they should be good whether you have opposite direction trades in the strategy or not.

    #119228

    There wasn’t much in it – less than 10% difference, but better as one code doing both long and short. (I’m talking about Fifi’s version, posted above as v2_MOD – my original worked better as separate long and short).

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 523 total)

Create your free account now and post your request to benefit from the help of the community
Register or Login