DPO Indicator differences between PRT versions 10 and 11.1

• 10/06/2019 at 1:00 PM #109401
  NimceProfity

  Hi,

  I’m using the following code for the indicator:

  return DPO[27](high[0])

   

  However, I get different results for the same stock (AMZN, for example), I’m attaching screenshots for both versions, and the difference.

  How can I bypass this? or maybe I’m using the DPO Indicator the wrong way in the new version?

   

  Thanks

   

   

  

  NimceProfity

  Participant

  Topics: 2

  Replies: 5

  Been thanked: 0 times
  10/07/2019 at 9:52 AM #109489
  Nicolas

  You aren’t the first one to complain about DPO in version 11, but first let’s check things together: what is your broker? Are your using the version 10 and 11 of the platform both at prorealtime.com?

   

  

  Nicolas

  Keymaster

  Topics: 81

  Replies: 20828

  Been thanked: 4739 times
  10/07/2019 at 10:34 AM #109499
  NimceProfity

  Hi,

  I use no broker, I’m exercising using the software.

  I use the both versions, yes, and I noticed this difference in DPO.

  Is it a known bug?

  

  NimceProfity

  Participant

  Topics: 2

  Replies: 5

  Been thanked: 0 times
  10/07/2019 at 1:38 PM #109525
  Nicolas

  The DPO has been changed in the last version of the platform. As you probably know, it was using the future of price to calculate and while it was possible in history, it was not in real time. I think that this behavior had been completely removed, I’m waiting for more information on how it has evolved since v10.3 and will let you know.

  

  Nicolas

  Keymaster

  Topics: 81

  Replies: 20828

  Been thanked: 4739 times
  10/07/2019 at 4:43 PM #109540
  NimceProfity

  Thank you, waiting for your answer.

  It’d be enough for me to know how to have the same behavior of DPO at version 10, in version 11.1.

  

  NimceProfity

  Participant

  Topics: 2

  Replies: 5

  Been thanked: 0 times
  10/10/2019 at 8:57 AM #109782
  Nicolas

  Well, with version 11 you can’t get the same behavior as before. DPO was continuously repainting on each new tick received in previous version of PRT. By now, it will not erase and recalculate itself as time goes by..

  

  Nicolas

  Keymaster

  Topics: 81

  Replies: 20828

  Been thanked: 4739 times
  10/11/2019 at 10:10 PM #109982
  adxx

  prt 11 very bad .. codess  very problem .. not working  toomany code corectly ..

  

  adxx

  Participant

  Topics: 0

  Replies: 1

  Been thanked: 0 times
  10/14/2019 at 9:49 AM #110097
  Nicolas

  If you find any problem, please send technical report by using the tool of the platform, in the Help section. V11 is a major turn in how the code is handle with the new engine.

  

  Nicolas

  Keymaster

  Topics: 81

  Replies: 20828

  Been thanked: 4739 times
  10/25/2019 at 7:33 AM #111148
  conrai

  I have the same problem with the indicator “LOWESS” – “HURST” developed long time ago by Mustafa Belkhayate

  It is very usefull for me and is a pity not to have it

  

  conrai

  Participant

  Topics: 1

  Replies: 1

  Been thanked: 0 times
• Author
  Posts